OpenClaw (Moltbot/Clawdbot) Use Cases and Security 2026
OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot and Clawdbot) is an open-source, self-hosted AI assistant designed to execute local computing tasks and interface with users through standard messaging platforms. Unlike traditional chatbots that function as advisors generating text, OpenClaw operates as an autonomous agent that can execute shell commands, manage files, and automate browser operations on the host machine.
By early 2026, OpenClaw had surpassed 100,000+ GitHub stars in three days, driven by its privacy-first architecture and proactive capabilities. See how OpenClaw works through hands-on deployment, its architecture, real-world use cases, and security risks:
Use cases of OpenClaw
To evaluate OpenClaw beyond documentation, we deployed it on a CPU on Runpod with Ubuntu 24.04 and tested it with a set of practical, everyday automation tasks using a messaging-based workflow.
File organization and system automation
We tested OpenClaw’s ability to perform file system operations by instructing it to create and organize folders within a downloads directory. The agent successfully created synthetic directories, classified files by type, and moved them to the appropriate locations using shell-level commands. These operations were executed reliably without requiring an active terminal session once the agent was running.
Receipt processing and spreadsheet generation
To assess document understanding and file generation, we provided OpenClaw with an image of a grocery receipt and asked it to add the contents to a spreadsheet. The agent extracted the items, structured them in tabular form, and generated a spreadsheet. Upon request, it could also return the resulting .xlsx file directly through the messaging interface.
This test showed that OpenClaw can extract data, structure it, and save files in a single workflow.
Proactive monitoring and notifications
We also tested OpenClaw’s proactive capabilities by configuring it to monitor a directory and notify us when a specific file appeared. Once the trigger condition was met, the agent initiated contact without prompting the user, sent a notification, and executed the predefined follow-up action.
This behavior confirmed that OpenClaw can function as an always-on background agent, capable of initiating actions and communicating in response to events rather than just responding to direct commands.
Overall observations
Across these tests, OpenClaw performed reliably for lightweight, recurring tasks such as file organization, simple data processing, and event-based notifications. Basic setup was straightforward, but enabling complex workflows required configuring multiple external services and API keys. Some integrations demand broad permissions, which increases setup time and raises security considerations.
This means that OpenClaw is easy to start with for basic automation, but fully operational deployments require detailed configuration and careful permission management.
How OpenClaw can be used in practice
While the previous section summarizes our hands-on evaluation, the following outlines how OpenClaw is typically positioned and used in real-world deployments.
OpenClaw is not a consumer assistant designed for ad-hoc personal tasks. In practice, it functions as a remote operational layer for machines that require continuous, lightweight automation without a graphical interface.
Core interaction model
Once deployed, OpenClaw operates via message-driven commands rather than interactive sessions. Users communicate with the agent via messaging platforms such as Telegram, WhatsApp, or other channels OpenClaw supports, while execution occurs on the host machine.
This design enables three practical usage patterns:
- Remote system operations
Users can manage files, run scripts, or query system state without logging into the machine. For example, organizing directories, triggering batch jobs, or checking disk usage can be done from a mobile device. - Scheduled and conditional automation
With cron integration and its heartbeat mechanism, OpenClaw can independently monitor conditions and respond without explicit prompts. This includes tasks like checking server uptime, monitoring log files, or tracking threshold-based metrics such as stock prices or API status. - Delegated task execution
OpenClaw can serve as an execution proxy for specific workflows, such as managing incoming emails, updating folders, or posting predefined content to social media platforms, as long as the necessary skills and permissions are enabled.
Skills as the true control layer
Unlike visual computer-use agents, OpenClaw’s capabilities depend on the enabled skills. These skills govern what the agent can and cannot do, such as:
- File system access
- Browser automation
- Email or calendar integration
- External API interaction
Without these skills, the agent has no operational power. As a result, the security and reliability of a OpenClaw deployment depend less on prompt quality and more on permission design.
Early-stage adoption considerations
At its current maturity, OpenClaw is best suited for:
- Secondary machines, servers, or sandboxed environments
- Accounts created specifically for automation purposes
- Non-critical workflows where failure modes are acceptable
Using OpenClaw with high-value personal accounts or production systems requires careful isolation and monitoring.
Running OpenClaw without a VPS: Cloudflare Moltworker
While OpenClaw is commonly deployed on local machines or VPS instances, with Cloudflare’s Workers1 , it is possible to deploy and run AI agents on serverless execution platforms.
Cloudflare Workers
Cloudflare Workers is a serverless execution platform that allows developers to run short, event-driven code on Cloudflare. Instead of deploying agents on virtual machines or containers, developers deploy application logic that executes in response to requests or scheduled events.
Each worker execution is stateless by default. Any temporary data or files created during execution are discarded once the request completes. As a result, Workers cannot store long-term state on their own.
Applications that need to persist data, such as conversation history, agent memory, etc., must store that data in a separate persistent storage service. In Cloudflare’s ecosystem, this role is typically filled by Cloudflare R2, an object storage service that retains data independently of Worker lifetimes.
Moltworker: Cloudflare’s OpenClaw deployment
Moltworker is a reference deployment that adapts OpenClaw to run on Cloudflare Workers instead of a traditional server. It shows how a self-hosted AI agent can operate in a serverless, sandbox environment while retaining persistent state.
In this setup, OpenClaw’s execution logic runs inside Cloudflare Workers, while agent memory, logs, and other artifacts are stored in Cloudflare R2. Since R2 provides durable storage independent of Worker lifetimes, agent state persists across executions and restarts.
R2 includes a free usage tier (up to 10 GB of stored data and a large number of read/write operations 2 ), meaning small OpenClaw deployments can operate without additional infrastructure costs beyond LLM API usage. However, you will need a Cloudflare account and a minimum $5 USD Workers paid plan subscription to use Sandbox Containers.
Tradeoffs and suitability
Moltworker is best suited for event-driven AI agents that activate in response to discrete inputs rather than running continuously.
Example use cases
- Chat-based assistants: An internal assistant that responds to chat messages, retrieves past conversation context from storage, and calls an external LLM API only when a user sends a message.
- On-demand automation agents: A OpenClaw instance that runs when triggered by a webhook (e.g., a new GitHub issue or form submission), performs a short sequence of actions, stores results, and exits.
- Low-traffic personal or experimental agents: Individual developers running OpenClaw for research or testing, where the agent is idle most of the time, and the VPS cost should scale with usage rather than runtime.
The reason is that, in the examples above, the agent sleeps most of the time and wakes up only when the user sends a message or a webhook fires. On a VPS or local machine, the server stays running, and you pay for uptime. But in Claudflare Workers, the agent runs only when triggered. There is no cost or resource usage while idle.
When Moltworker may be less suitable
- Long-running autonomous agents: An agent designed to operate continuously (e.g., monitoring multiple data sources, making periodic decisions without external triggers) may exceed execution limits or require frequent restarts.
- Agents requiring specialized hardware or system access: Deployments that depend on local GPUs, custom binaries, or persistent local filesystems cannot be easily accommodated within a Worker-based runtime.
In these cases, traditional local or VPS-based deployments provide greater flexibility and control.
Is OpenClaw safe to use?
OpenClaw’s security profile depends equally on deployment choices and model behavior. While its documentation emphasizes safe command execution and ethical constraints, real-world risk primarily emerges from network exposure and permission scope.
Exposed gateway and remote takeover risk
By default, OpenClaw’s gateway is bound to the local loopback interface, limiting access to the host machine. However, some users reconfigure the gateway to bind to a public or non-loopback interface in order to access the agent remotely.
When this occurs, multiple internal services and ports may become externally reachable. In such configurations, attackers can interact with the agent’s control surface over the network.
If users expose the gateway without strong authentication and network controls, OpenClaw effectively becomes a remote command execution interface. An attacker could issue commands, access files, or manipulate the host system, resulting in full machine compromise.
This risk is independent of large language model behavior and applies even if the agent strictly follows its internal safety rules.
Agent-level risks (LLM and workflow related)
In addition to infrastructure risks, OpenClaw inherits the standard failure modes of autonomous agents:
- Ambiguous command interpretation: Shell access enables strong actions. Misinterpreted instructions may lead to unintended file deletion or system changes.
- Prompt injection through trusted inputs: If the agent processes emails, documents, or web content, malicious instructions embedded in those inputs could influence its behavior.
- Third-party skill execution: Skills extend functionality but also expand the attack surface. A poorly designed or malicious skill can introduce vulnerabilities or leak credentials.
Data exposure via external APIs
Although OpenClaw executes locally, it relies on external model providers for reasoning. Prompts and selected file snippets may be transmitted to third-party APIs, potentially exposing sensitive data to the outside world depending on configuration.
Practical security guidance
At its current maturity, OpenClaw should be treated as privileged automation infrastructure instead of a consumer assistant.
Best practices include:
- Keeping the gateway bound to loopback unless protected by VPNs or firewalls
- Avoiding public exposure of agent endpoints
- Running OpenClaw on isolated machines or low-privilege accounts
- Limiting enabled skills to the minimum required
- Monitoring logs for unexpected command execution
Failure to apply these controls shifts the risk from “AI error” to traditional remote system compromise.
What is OpenClaw?
OpenClaw acts as a bridge between Large Language Models (LLMs) and a user’s local operating system. While it uses external model APIs or local models for reasoning, the execution environment remains entirely on the user’s hardware.
The system architecture consists of four primary components:
- The gateway: A background service acting as the front door. Managing connections to messaging platforms.
- The agent: The reasoning engine (LLM) that interprets intent.
- Skills: Modular capabilities that extend the agent’s reach, such as browser automation (via Puppeteer), file system access, calendar integration, etc.
- Memory: A persistent storage layer (often utilizing Markdown files) that retains context, preferences, and long-term conversation history.
What makes OpenClaw unique?
To understand why OpenClaw gained attention, it helps to compare it with two common agent designs: visual agents and CLI tools. Other agents try to simulate human interaction or assist with coding. OpenClaw runs as a headless background service, which changes how the agent operates.
OpenClaw vs. Visual Agents
The industry standard for computer use relies on visual grounding. These agents take screenshots, process pixel data using vision-language models (VLMs), and calculate coordinates to simulate mouse clicks.
- Visual agent approach: They face a grounding bottleneck. Computer use agents are still struggling with dense interfaces, and visual processing introduces high latency and the potential for pixel misalignment errors.
- The OpenClaw approach: OpenClaw is headless, meaning it bypasses the graphical user interface (GUI) entirely. It does not look at a file icon to move it; it executes a system shell command (e.g., mv /downloads/*.pdf /documents).
As a result, by replacing visual inference with direct code execution, OpenClaw eliminates grounding errors and operates at machine speed rather than human interface speed.
OpenClaw vs. CLI agents
Tools such as Claude Code or Open Interpreter act as interactive utilities. They run within a terminal window and respond only when the user inputs a command. These tools function as reactive co-pilots.
- CLI agent approach: CLI agents suffer from session amnesia. Once you close the terminal window, the agent stops running, and context is often lost. They require the user to be physically present at the machine.
- The OpenClaw approach: OpenClaw runs as a gateway daemon (background service) on a local server or VPS. It persists 24/7, maintaining long-term memory in local files (e.g., MEMORY.md).
As a result, you do not need to be at your computer. You can text your agent from a mobile device via Telegram, WhatsApp, or other channels OpenClaw supports to execute tasks on your home server, and the agent retains context across weeks of interaction.
A key difference is that OpenClaw can initiate interaction. Traditional CLI and visual agents wait for a user prompt (Reactive). OpenClaw features a Heartbeat Engine and cron job integration that allows it to be Proactive.
- Instead of you asking “Is the server down?” or “Did the stock price drop?”, OpenClaw wakes itself up, checks the data, and messages you if a threshold is met.
Architectural comparison matrix
This comparison shows that OpenClaw prioritizes persistence and automation speed over human-like interaction. Its design trades visual grounding and interactive safety for lower latency and always-on execution.
Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE and NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and resources that referenced AIMultiple.
Throughout his career, Cem served as a tech consultant, tech buyer and tech entrepreneur. He advised enterprises on their technology decisions at McKinsey & Company and Altman Solon for more than a decade. He also published a McKinsey report on digitalization.
He led technology strategy and procurement of a telco while reporting to the CEO. He has also led commercial growth of deep tech company Hypatos that reached a 7 digit annual recurring revenue and a 9 digit valuation from 0 within 2 years. Cem's work in Hypatos was covered by leading technology publications like TechCrunch and Business Insider.
Cem regularly speaks at international technology conferences. He graduated from Bogazici University as a computer engineer and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.
Be the first to comment
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.