Kimi K3 added
The newest model in the AIMultiple Intelligence Index is Kimi K3.
LLM Benchmarks
One transparent Intelligence Index combining public benchmarks with AIMultiple's own agentic, RAG and enterprise-reasoning evaluations. See the methodology.
TOP MODEL
Claude Fable 5
Index 92
Best value
MiniMax M3
$0.42 / 1M
Fastest
GPT OSS 120B
0.23s TTFT
Coverage
64 models
8 benchmarks · 336 eval runs
AIMultiple Intelligence Index
Leaderboard
The highest-scoring models across all benchmarks.
Filter & Sort
# | Model | Index | LegalBench | FinanceReasoning | Text-to-SQL | Agentic RAG | ARC-AGI-2 | Agentic LLM Benchmark | FrontierMath | Swe-Bench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Claude Fable 5 Anthropic | 92 | 89 | 90 | 90 | 98 | - | 69 | - | - |
| 2 |  Kimi K3 Moonshot AI | 88 | 86 | 88 | 77 | 93 | - | 73 | - | - |
| 3 |  GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI | 87 | 87 | 90 | 74 | 87 | 93 | 62 | - | - |
| 4 |  Grok 4.5 X | 86 | 86 | 88 | 79 | 83 | - | 73 | - | - |
| 5 | GPT-5.5 OpenAI | 83 | 87 | - | - | - | 85 | 59 | - | - |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI | 80 | 85 | 87 | 71 | 91 | 84 | 61 | - | - |
| 7 | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro OpenAI | 80 | - | 91 | 79 | 96 | - | 54 | - | - |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | 78 | - | 88 | 68 | 80 | 69 | 72 | - | - |
| 9 |  Gemini 3 Pro Preview Google | 77 | 87 | 86 | 60 | 89 | 31 | - | - | - |
| 10 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google | 77 | 87 | 87 | 65 | 89 | 77 | 46 | 27 | - |
Page 1 of 7 | ||||||||||
Cost$20.00
Latency4.02s
Context1M
TTFT4.02s
LegalBench
89
FinanceReasoning
90
Text-to-SQL
90
Agentic RAG
98
Agentic LLM Benchmark
69
Cost$6.00
Latency2.93s
Context1M
TTFT2.93s
LegalBench
86
FinanceReasoning
88
Text-to-SQL
77
Agentic RAG
93
Agentic LLM Benchmark
73
Cost$11.25
Latency4.31s
Context1M
TTFT4.31s
LegalBench
87
FinanceReasoning
90
Text-to-SQL
74
Agentic RAG
87
ARC-AGI-2
93
Agentic LLM Benchmark
62
Cost$3.00
Latency7.25s
Context500k
TTFT7.25s
LegalBench
86
FinanceReasoning
88
Text-to-SQL
79
Agentic RAG
83
Agentic LLM Benchmark
73
Cost$11.25
Latency0.70s
Context272k
TTFT0.70s
LegalBench
87
ARC-AGI-2
85
Agentic LLM Benchmark
59
Cost$4.50
Latency1.62s
Context1M
TTFT1.62s
LegalBench
85
FinanceReasoning
87
Text-to-SQL
71
Agentic RAG
91
ARC-AGI-2
84
Agentic LLM Benchmark
61
Cost$11.25
Latency11.11s
Context1M
TTFT11.11s
FinanceReasoning
91
Text-to-SQL
79
Agentic RAG
96
Agentic LLM Benchmark
54
Cost$10.00
Latency1.71s
Context1M
TTFT1.71s
FinanceReasoning
88
Text-to-SQL
68
Agentic RAG
80
ARC-AGI-2
69
Agentic LLM Benchmark
72
Cost$4.50
Latency-
Context1M
TTFT
LegalBench
87
FinanceReasoning
86
Text-to-SQL
60
Agentic RAG
89
ARC-AGI-2
31
Cost$4.50
Latency22.02s
Context1M
TTFT22.02s
LegalBench
87
FinanceReasoning
87
Text-to-SQL
65
Agentic RAG
89
ARC-AGI-2
77
Agentic LLM Benchmark
46
FrontierMath
27
Page 1 of 7
Frontier Over Time
Intelligence Index by model release date
Cost vs Performance
Blended cost against Intelligence Index
Model × Benchmark
Top models on selected benchmarks
Methodology
How The Index is Built
The Intelligence Index normalizes each benchmark to a 0-100 scale and averages a model's relative standing across the benchmarks it was evaluated on. Each benchmark below feeds that score.
AIMultiple
FinanceReasoningComplex multi-step financial reasoning across 238 hard FinanceReasoning questions.AIMultiple
Text-to-SQLNatural-language-to-SQL query generation accuracy across 35+ LLMs.AIMultiple
Agentic RAGMulti-database routing & SQL query generation across 5 databases (BIRD-SQL, 500 questions).AIMultiple
AI MemoryLong-context numeric fact retrieval across document positions (100 items, 14 transcripts).AIMultiple
AI HallucinationResistance to fabricating unmentioned metrics in long-context documents (204 traps, 14 transcripts).Public
Humanity's Last ExamExpert-level, closed-book reasoning across 100+ academic subjects (2.5k questions).Public
SciCodeResearch-level scientific coding across physics, math, biology & chemistry (338 subproblems)Public
LegalBenchCrowd-sourced legal reasoning across 162 tasks from legal practitioners.Public
FrontierMathUnpublished, expert-authored research math problems (Tiers 1–4).Public
ARC-AGI-2Novel visual reasoning puzzles testing generalization, not memorization.Public
Swe-BenchReal-world GitHub issues resolved end-to-end (full 2,294-instance set).Public
LiveCodeBenchContamination-free, continuously updated competitive coding problems.AIMultiple
Agentic LLM BenchmarkAgentic coding across 10 software-dev tasks via CLI tool (~3,500 validation steps).Recent Updates
Recent Updates
Latest changes to the Intelligence Index, model coverage and AIMultiple benchmark methodology.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra
New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro
New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.
AI Model Release TimelineLast 15 models in 41 days
Key AI model releases from leading providers over the past 41 days.
Provider
21 Jul 2026
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite +1 moreGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.6 Flash
13 Aug 2026
Gemini 3.7 Flash
16 Jul 2026
Muse Spark 1.1
05 Aug 2026
Muse Spark 1.2
09 Aug 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B
24 Jul 2026
Claude Opus 5
16 Jul 2026
Kimi K3
09 Jul 2026
GPT-5.6 Luna +5 moreGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna ProGPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol ProGPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Terra Pro
08 Jul 2026
Grok 4.5
Explore LLM Use Cases, Analyses & Benchmarks
LLM
Insight
Aug 17LLM Automation: Top 7 Tools & 8 Case Studies
LLM automation refers to shift to intelligent automation tools that leverage LLMs, including AI agents, fine-tuned LLMs and RAG models to automate and coordinate tasks. Explore what LLM automation is, its top real-life applications and major tools: Large language models in automation is a systematic approach that combines Natural Language Processing (NLP) with existing process…
LLM
Insight
Aug 17Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) vs LLMs
We evaluated the performance of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in financial reasoning tasks using a carefully selected dataset. By analyzing a subset of high-quality financial samples, we assess the models’ capabilities in processing and reasoning with multimodal data in the financial domain. The methodology section provides detailed insights into the dataset and evaluation framework employed.…
LLM
Feature Comparison
Aug 17Compare 9 Large Language Models in Healthcare
We benchmarked 9 LLMs using the MedQA dataset, a graduate-level clinical exam benchmark derived from USMLE questions. Each model answered the same multiple-choice clinical scenarios using a standardized prompt, enabling direct comparison of accuracy. We also recorded latency per question by dividing total runtime by the number of MedQA items completed. Benchmark methodology: This benchmark…
LLM
Benchmark
Aug 16Intelligence Density of 71 LLMs for Smarter & Denser Models
We tracked 71 LLMs released between February 2023 and May 2026 and collected 10 public benchmarks to measure intelligence density. We divided the capability score by the resource the model consumes (active parameters, training compute, and inference price). To calculate intelligence density, we executed the following steps: See methodology for the scoring approach, and per-resource…
LLM
Insight
Aug 1450+ ChatGPT Use Cases with Real Life Examples
ChatGPT reached approximately 1 billion weekly active users in early 2026 roughly 10% of the world’s population.50 OpenAI surpassed $20 billion in annual revenue for 2025, confirmed by CFO Sarah Friar.51 The Anthropic Economic Index distinguishes two modes of use: augmentation, in which a human interacts with AI, and automation, in which AI completes tasks…
LLM
Benchmark
Aug 14Benchmark of 40+ LLMs in Finance: Claude Fable 5 & GPT-5.6 Sol
We evaluated LLMs on 238 hard questions from the FinanceReasoning benchmark (Tang et al.).67 This subset targets the most challenging financial-reasoning tasks, assessing complex, multi-step quantitative reasoning involving financial concepts and formulas. Our evaluation employed a custom prompt design and scoring criteria of accuracy and token consumption. For a detailed explanation of how these metrics…
LLM
Benchmark
Aug 14AIM Enterprise: Agentic Enterprise Benchmark
Enterprises use LLMs everyday for their regular tasks. To find most cost efficient LLMs, we designed AIM Enterprise, an agentic enterprise benchmark, where we used 69 enterprise tasks in different categories. Each model delivered one file per task. Scores are relative: the judges rank every answer against the other answers to the same task, so…
LLM
Insight
Aug 13LLM Scaling Laws: Analysis from AI Researchers
Large language models predict the next token based on patterns learned from text data. The term LLM scaling laws refers to empirical regularities that link model performance to the amount of compute, training data, and model parameters used during training. To understand how these relationships influence modern model design in practice, we reviewed findings from…
LLM
Insight
Aug 13LLM Observability Tools: Weights & Biases, Langsmith
LLM applications have expanded from single-turn chats into multi-step agents that use tools, query databases, and coordinate with other models, making their behavior harder to interpret. LLM observability provides continuous visibility into these complex workflows, helping organizations monitor quality, detect failures, troubleshoot issues, and manage performance and costs. W&B Weave is Weights & Biases‘ LLM…
LLM
Benchmark
Aug 12LLM Latency Benchmark by Use Cases in 2026
We benchmarked 11 top large language models with a total of 1,320 requests, splitting reasoning and non-reasoning models, and measured first-token latency, per-token latency, and overall response time. You can find details on how we measured latency here. We report reasoning and non-reasoning models separately. Reasoning models spend several seconds thinking before the first visible…