Top 5 Digital Guardian Alternatives with Features
Explore the top alternative vendors of Digital Guardian based on our benchmark ratings and data security features such as data classification, context inspection, and behavioral analytics.
5 Digital Guardian alternatives comparison
Features
Software product | Multi-OS | Deployment (on-prem&cloud) | Data classification | Context inspection | Behavioral analytics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | |
Sophos Intercept X Endpoint | MacOS&Windows | cloud | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
Forcepoint DLP | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Trellix DLP | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Digital Guardian Endpoint DLP | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Microsoft Purview DLP | MacOS&Windows | cloud | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
See the definitions for common and differentiating features.
User ratings & reviews
Product | Average score* | Number of employees** |
|---|---|---|
4.5 out of 160 reviews | 132 | |
Digital Guardian Endpoint DLP | 3.7 out of 63 reviews | 204 |
Trellix DLP (Mcafee) | 4.2 out of 1,792 reviews | 5,567 |
Sophos Intercept X Endpoint | 4.5 out of 480 reviews | 4,686 |
Forcepoint DLP | 4.3 out of 76 reviews | 1,939 |
Microsoft Purview DLP | 4.2 out of 36 reviews | 244,900 |
*Based on the total number of reviews and average ratings (on a 5-point scale) from leading software review platforms.
**The number of employees is gathered from publicly available resources (i.e., LinkedIn).
Ranking: Vendors with links are sponsors and listed at the top. Other products are ranked based on their total number of reviews.
See why we chose these metrics for vendors.
Digital Guardian Endpoint DLP’s shortcomings
Reviewers have identified the following flaws, which have been raised multiple times:
1. Resource intensity
Multiple user reviews claim that it is resource-intensive, which makes it time-consuming.
The reviewers mention that Digital Guardian may be resource-intensive, and navigation around the management platform is found to be cumbersome.
2. Reporting
Multiple user reviews remark on the unavailability of report customization. Though the software provides its users with detailed reports, some users find it difficult to utilize.
The reviewers claim satisfaction with Digital Guardian’s sensitive data protection capabilities and mention concern over lacking report customization and an unintuitive UI.
3. Complexity
Multiple reviewers expressed favor for Digital Guardian’s overall data security capabilities; they wrote about the complex use and setup of Digital Guardian.
4. Scaling
The reviewers claim that, like Digital Guardian’s data loss prevention functionalities, scaling up the number of agents needs additional support in order to keep up.
Top 5 alternatives analyzed
This section provides a user-reviewed analysis from sites such as G2, Gartner, Capterra, and TrustRadius. The pros and cons are from user reviews and were only chosen if several users brought up the same issue.
Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys
The company offers DLP solutions with multi-OS compatibility. Netwrix now includes CoSosys’ Endpoint Protector. Netwrix, which was established in 2006, offers solutions that address the identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover cybersecurity aspects of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Pros
- Endpoint encryption: Multiple reviewers like the endpoint encryption capabilities.
- Device control: Endpoint Protector has the most comprehensive device control features among all its competitors.
Cons
- User experience: While some reviewers find the user interface easy to use, several reviewers find it difficult to navigate.
Choose Endpoint Protector for robust DLP software with strong device control capabilities.
Trellix DLP
McAfee is headquartered in California, United States. The company is best known for its antivirus software offerings. McAfee offers antimalware software protection for mobile and desktop security.
Pros
- Antivirus: The product is claimed to be good protection against trojans and malware.
Cons
- Price: The price is claimed to be high by multiple reviewers.
Sophos Intercept X
Endpoint security and threat intelligence are the main areas of focus for Line-Securesoft’s Santa Fe-based product, Sophos Intercept X.
Pros
- Platform: The user reviews mention that the unified Sophos Central platform is easy to use.
Cons
- Resource intensity: It is found to be resource-intensive by multiple reviewers.
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint is headquartered in Texas, United States. The company offers a range of cybersecurity products covering cloud firewalls, ZTNA, cloud access security brokering, and DLP. See Forcepoint DLP and its alternatives.
Pros
- Web & email security: Multiple reviewers find email and web security tools to be useful.
Cons
- User interface: The user interface was found to be inconvenient at the beginning by multiple reviewers.
Microsoft Purview DLP
Paul Allen and Bill Gates founded the technology company Microsoft Corporation. The company’s Windows line of operating systems and software, which includes the cloud computing platform, Microsoft Azure, is one of its best-known products. See Microsoft Purview and its alternatives.
Pros
- Integration with other programs: According to the majority of reviewers, the product is well integrated with other Microsoft products.
Cons
- Limited non-Windows OS coverage: Multiple reviewers express concern about limited coverage on non-Windows-based operating systems.
Vendor selection criteria
- Number of reviews: We included vendors with more than 50 total user reviews.
- Average rating: Above 4/5 rating on average across all software review platforms.
Common features
We selected the vendors that deliver access control, policy enforcement, alerting and notification, and reporting functions.
Differentiating features
- Integration with operating systems: Requirements regarding operating systems. Multi-OS compatibility includes support for Windows, macOS, and Linux-based systems.
- Deployment: Includes cloud-based and on-premises options.
- Data classification: Enables tagging data and classifying it in categories relevant to its level of sensitivity.
- Encryption (data in motion and data at rest): See endpoint encryption.
- Context inspection: Inspection based on context that may involve sensitive data.
- Behavioral analytics: Models unrisky and risky endpoint behavior by analyzing sets of data.
FAQ
Further reading
Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE and NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and resources that referenced AIMultiple.
Throughout his career, Cem served as a tech consultant, tech buyer and tech entrepreneur. He advised enterprises on their technology decisions at McKinsey & Company and Altman Solon for more than a decade. He also published a McKinsey report on digitalization.
He led technology strategy and procurement of a telco while reporting to the CEO. He has also led commercial growth of deep tech company Hypatos that reached a 7 digit annual recurring revenue and a 9 digit valuation from 0 within 2 years. Cem's work in Hypatos was covered by leading technology publications like TechCrunch and Business Insider.
Cem regularly speaks at international technology conferences. He graduated from Bogazici University as a computer engineer and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.
Be the first to comment
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.