Premium
Services
Premium

AIM LLM Index

One transparent index combining public benchmarks with AIMultiple's own agentic, RAG and enterprise-reasoning evaluations. How the Index Is Built

TOP MODEL
Claude Opus 5.5
Index 78
Best value
GPT-6.1 Sol
$4.00 / 1M
Fastest
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
0.37s TTFT
AIM LLM Index

Leaderboard

The highest-scoring models across all benchmarks.

Filter & Sort
#
Model
Index
AIM-Agentic-RAG
AIM-AI-Bias
AIM-FinanceReasoning
AIM-Text-to-SQL
CritPt
FrontierMath
MMMU-Pro
SciCode
Terminal-Bench 4.0
1
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
78
909492883295886760
2
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
74
849887663298875660
3
GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
74
8198906532100865656
4
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
74
859389743180866164
5
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
74
849890673188866355
6
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
70
94-91792778-6257
7
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
70
829789543190835844
8
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
68
858190642973845649
9
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder
Meta
64
86-92562871-6052
10
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta
62
779589492646826033
Page 1 of 4

Cost$8.00
Latency3.05s
Context1M
TTFT3.05s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
90
AIM-AI-Bias
94
AIM-FinanceReasoning
92
AIM-Text-to-SQL
88
CritPt
32
FrontierMath
95
MMMU-Pro
88
SciCode
67
Terminal-Bench 4.0
60

Cost$20.00
Latency6.48s
Context1M
TTFT6.48s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
84
AIM-AI-Bias
98
AIM-FinanceReasoning
87
AIM-Text-to-SQL
66
CritPt
32
FrontierMath
98
MMMU-Pro
87
SciCode
56
Terminal-Bench 4.0
60

Cost$4.00
Latency3.15s
Context1M
TTFT3.15s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
81
AIM-AI-Bias
98
AIM-FinanceReasoning
90
AIM-Text-to-SQL
65
CritPt
32
FrontierMath
100
MMMU-Pro
86
SciCode
56
Terminal-Bench 4.0
56

Cost$4.00
Latency1.34s
Context1M
TTFT1.34s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
85
AIM-AI-Bias
93
AIM-FinanceReasoning
89
AIM-Text-to-SQL
74
CritPt
31
FrontierMath
80
MMMU-Pro
86
SciCode
61
Terminal-Bench 4.0
64

Cost$20.00
Latency2.95s
Context1M
TTFT2.95s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
84
AIM-AI-Bias
98
AIM-FinanceReasoning
90
AIM-Text-to-SQL
67
CritPt
31
FrontierMath
88
MMMU-Pro
86
SciCode
63
Terminal-Bench 4.0
55

Cost$4.00
Latency4.70s
Context1M
TTFT4.70s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
94
AIM-FinanceReasoning
91
AIM-Text-to-SQL
79
CritPt
27
FrontierMath
78
SciCode
62
Terminal-Bench 4.0
57

Cost$4.00
Latency2.76s
Context1M
TTFT2.76s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
82
AIM-AI-Bias
97
AIM-FinanceReasoning
89
AIM-Text-to-SQL
54
CritPt
31
FrontierMath
90
MMMU-Pro
83
SciCode
58
Terminal-Bench 4.0
44

Cost$10.00
Latency3.16s
Context1M
TTFT3.16s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
85
AIM-AI-Bias
81
AIM-FinanceReasoning
90
AIM-Text-to-SQL
64
CritPt
29
FrontierMath
73
MMMU-Pro
84
SciCode
56
Terminal-Bench 4.0
49

Cost$8.00
Latency51.49s
Context1M
TTFT51.49s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
86
AIM-FinanceReasoning
92
AIM-Text-to-SQL
56
CritPt
28
FrontierMath
71
SciCode
60
Terminal-Bench 4.0
52

Cost$2.00
Latency70.63s
Context1M
TTFT70.63s
AIM-Agentic-RAG
77
AIM-AI-Bias
95
AIM-FinanceReasoning
89
AIM-Text-to-SQL
49
CritPt
26
FrontierMath
46
MMMU-Pro
82
SciCode
60
Terminal-Bench 4.0
33
Page 1 of 4
Frontier Over Time
LLM Index by model release date
Cost vs Performance
Blended cost against LLM Index
Model × Benchmark
Top models on selected benchmarks

How the Index Is Built

A model's index score is the average of its results across the benchmarks below. Scores already on a 0-100 scale are used as-is; others are rescaled to 0-100. A model missing a benchmark has it excluded rather than scored as zero, and every benchmark carries equal weight. A model needs to be scored in at least 2 AIMultiple benchmarks to be ranked.

Benchmarks We Used

Recent Updates

Latest changes to the AIM LLM Index, model coverage and AIMultiple benchmark methodology.

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

New model added to the AIM LLM Index.

Meta

Muse Wonder

New model added to the AIM LLM Index.

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

New model added to the AIM LLM Index.

OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

New model added to the AIM LLM Index.

LLM Release TimelineThe pace of AI innovation
AI Labs
Meta
Meta
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
21 Aug
Muse Spark 1.3 +1 moreMuse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
02 Sep
Muse Wonder
12 Oct
Muse Spark Open
15 Oct
Google
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
02 Sep
Nano Banana 2.1
06 Oct
Gemini 4 Argon
13 Oct
Anthropic
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
01 Sep
Claude Opus 5.5
22 Sep
Claude Sonnet 5.5
28 Sep
Claude Haiku 5.5
07 Oct
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
04 Sep
GPT-6 Luna +1 moreGPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Sol
22 Sep
GPT-6.1 Sol
29 Sep
Upstage
Upstage
Solar Mini 4
23 Sep
Solar Decide
28 Sep
Alibaba Cloud
Alibaba Cloud
Qwen3.8 Flash
26 Aug
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
03 Sep
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
21 Sep
Qwen3.8 Max Prime
23 Sep
Z AI
Z AI
GLM 5.3
18 Aug
GLM 5.3 Flash
26 Aug
GLM 5.3 FlashX
18 Sep
GLM 5.3 Prime
23 Sep
X
X
Grok 4.7
21 Sep
Xiaomi
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash +2 moreMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
21 Sep
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
21 Aug
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
10 Sep

Explore LLM Use Cases, Analyses & Benchmarks

HALC-Bench: LLM Hallucination on Long-Context Retrieval Benchmark

LLM
Benchmark
Sep 15

HALC-Bench (LLM Hallucination on Long-Context Retrieval Benchmark) measures a large language model’s resistance to fabricating evidence for a metric that does not exist in the target document by using 3 haystacks placed at the beginning, middle, and end of the model’s context window, with 204 questions. claude-fable-5 answered all 204 traps correctly at every haystack…

Read More
LLM
Insight
Sep 2

LLM Observability Tools: Weights & Biases, Langsmith

LLM applications have expanded from single-turn chats into multi-step agents that use tools, query databases, and coordinate with other models, making their behavior harder to interpret. LLM observability provides continuous visibility into these complex workflows, helping organizations monitor quality, detect failures, troubleshoot issues, and manage performance and costs. W&B Weave is Weights & Biases‘ LLM…

LLM
Insight
Sep 1

LLM Fine-Tuning Guide for Enterprises

Follow the links for the specific solutions to your LLM output challenges. If your LLM: The widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) has improved our ability to process human language. However, their generic training often results in suboptimal performance for specific tasks. To overcome this limitation, fine-tuning methods are employed to tailor LLMs to…

LLM
Insight
Aug 27

LLM Automation: Top 7 Tools & 8 Case Studies 

LLM automation refers to shift to intelligent automation tools that leverage LLMs, including AI agents, fine-tuned LLMs and RAG models to automate and coordinate tasks. Explore what LLM automation is, its top real-life applications and major tools: Large language models in automation is a systematic approach that combines Natural Language Processing (NLP) with existing process…

LLM
Insight
Aug 19

ChatGPT for Customer Service: Top 10 Use Cases

ChatGPT has moved from novelty to infrastructure in customer service. Companies are using it to cut response times, handle volume their teams can’t absorb, and reduce the cost of routine interactions. But results vary sharply depending on how it’s implemented. OpenAI launched GPT-5.6, a materially more capable model that is better at instruction-following, reasoning across…

LLM
Benchmark
Aug 16

Intelligence Density of 71 LLMs for Smarter & Denser Models

We tracked 71 LLMs released between February 2023 and May 2026 and collected 10 public benchmarks to measure intelligence density. We divided the capability score by the resource the model consumes (active parameters, training compute, and inference price). To calculate intelligence density, we executed the following steps: See methodology for the scoring approach, and per-resource…

LLM
Benchmark
Apr 15

LLM Quantization: BF16 vs FP8 vs INT4

We benchmarked Qwen3-32B at 4 precision levels (BF16, FP8, GPTQ-Int8, GPTQ-Int4) on a single NVIDIA H100 80GB GPU. Each configuration was evaluated on 2 benchmarks (~12.2K questions) covering knowledge and code generation, plus 2,000+ inference runs to measure throughput. Int4 is 2.7x faster than BF16 while losing less than 2 points on MMLU-Pro, but code…