The newest model in the AIM LLM Index is Gemini 4 Argon.
AIM LLM Index
One transparent index combining public benchmarks with AIMultiple's own agentic, RAG and enterprise-reasoning evaluations. How the Index Is Built
Leaderboard
The highest-scoring models across all benchmarks.
# | Model | Index | AIM-Agentic-RAG | AIM-AI-Bias | AIM-FinanceReasoning | AIM-Text-to-SQL | CritPt | FrontierMath | MMMU-Pro | SciCode | Terminal-Bench 4.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic | 78 | 90 | 94 | 92 | 88 | 32 | 95 | 88 | 67 | 60 |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra OpenAI | 74 | 84 | 98 | 87 | 66 | 32 | 98 | 87 | 56 | 60 |
| 3 | GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI | 74 | 81 | 98 | 90 | 65 | 32 | 100 | 86 | 56 | 56 |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic | 74 | 85 | 93 | 89 | 74 | 31 | 80 | 86 | 61 | 64 |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic | 74 | 84 | 98 | 90 | 67 | 31 | 88 | 86 | 63 | 55 |
| 6 | Gemini 4 Argon Google | 70 | 94 | - | 91 | 79 | 27 | 78 | - | 62 | 57 |
| 7 | GPT-6 Sol OpenAI | 70 | 82 | 97 | 89 | 54 | 31 | 90 | 83 | 58 | 44 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 5 Anthropic | 68 | 85 | 81 | 90 | 64 | 29 | 73 | 84 | 56 | 49 |
| 9 | Muse Wonder Meta | 64 | 86 | - | 92 | 56 | 28 | 71 | - | 60 | 52 |
| 10 | Muse Spark 1.3 Meta | 62 | 77 | 95 | 89 | 49 | 26 | 46 | 82 | 60 | 33 |
How the Index Is Built
A model's index score is the average of its results across the benchmarks below. Scores already on a 0-100 scale are used as-is; others are rescaled to 0-100. A model missing a benchmark has it excluded rather than scored as zero, and every benchmark carries equal weight. A model needs to be scored in at least 2 AIMultiple benchmarks to be ranked.
Benchmarks We Used
Recent Updates
Latest changes to the AIM LLM Index, model coverage and AIMultiple benchmark methodology.
Gemini 4 Argon
New model added to the AIM LLM Index.
Muse Wonder
New model added to the AIM LLM Index.
Claude Haiku 5.5
New model added to the AIM LLM Index.
GPT-6.1 Sol
New model added to the AIM LLM Index.
Explore LLM Use Cases, Analyses & Benchmarks
LLM Observability Tools: Weights & Biases, Langsmith
LLM applications have expanded from single-turn chats into multi-step agents that use tools, query databases, and coordinate with other models, making their behavior harder to interpret. LLM observability provides continuous visibility into these complex workflows, helping organizations monitor quality, detect failures, troubleshoot issues, and manage performance and costs. W&B Weave is Weights & Biases‘ LLM…
LLM Fine-Tuning Guide for Enterprises
Follow the links for the specific solutions to your LLM output challenges. If your LLM: The widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) has improved our ability to process human language. However, their generic training often results in suboptimal performance for specific tasks. To overcome this limitation, fine-tuning methods are employed to tailor LLMs to…
LLM Automation: Top 7 Tools & 8 Case Studies
LLM automation refers to shift to intelligent automation tools that leverage LLMs, including AI agents, fine-tuned LLMs and RAG models to automate and coordinate tasks. Explore what LLM automation is, its top real-life applications and major tools: Large language models in automation is a systematic approach that combines Natural Language Processing (NLP) with existing process…
ChatGPT for Customer Service: Top 10 Use Cases
ChatGPT has moved from novelty to infrastructure in customer service. Companies are using it to cut response times, handle volume their teams can’t absorb, and reduce the cost of routine interactions. But results vary sharply depending on how it’s implemented. OpenAI launched GPT-5.6, a materially more capable model that is better at instruction-following, reasoning across…
Intelligence Density of 71 LLMs for Smarter & Denser Models
We tracked 71 LLMs released between February 2023 and May 2026 and collected 10 public benchmarks to measure intelligence density. We divided the capability score by the resource the model consumes (active parameters, training compute, and inference price). To calculate intelligence density, we executed the following steps: See methodology for the scoring approach, and per-resource…
LLM Quantization: BF16 vs FP8 vs INT4
We benchmarked Qwen3-32B at 4 precision levels (BF16, FP8, GPTQ-Int8, GPTQ-Int4) on a single NVIDIA H100 80GB GPU. Each configuration was evaluated on 2 benchmarks (~12.2K questions) covering knowledge and code generation, plus 2,000+ inference runs to measure throughput. Int4 is 2.7x faster than BF16 while losing less than 2 points on MMLU-Pro, but code…