RAG Benchmarks: Embedding Models, Vector DBs and Rerankers
RAG improves LLM reliability by grounding responses in external data. We benchmark the RAG stack across embedding models, rerankers, vector databases, frameworks and evaluation tools on retrieval accuracy, latency and quality.
Explore RAG Benchmarks: Embedding Models, Vector DBs and Rerankers
Agentic RAG Benchmark: Multi-Database Routing Across 36 LLMs
We benchmarked 36 large language models on cross-database routing. Each model receives a natural language question and 11 SQL databases described at paragraph level, then has to decide which database holds the answer before it writes any SQL. The 11 databases were drawn from 80 BIRD-SQL candidates by clustering their description embeddings, so the candidates…
RAG Frameworks: LangChain vs LangGraph vs LlamaIndex
We benchmarked 5 RAG frameworks: LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, Haystack, and DSPy, by building the same agentic RAG workflow with standardized components: identical models (GPT-4.1-mini), embeddings (BGE-small), retriever (Qdrant), and tools (Tavily web search). This isolates each framework’s true overhead and token efficiency. The benchmark consisted of 100 queries, with each framework running the full set…
Reranker Benchmark: Top 8 Models Compared
We benchmarked 8 reranker models on ~145k English Amazon reviews to measure how much a reranking stage improves dense retrieval. We retrieved top-100 candidates with multilingual-e5-base, reranked them with each model, and evaluated the top-10 results against 300 queries, each referencing concrete details from its source review. The best reranker lifted Hit@1 from 62.67% to…
Best RAG Tools, Frameworks, and Libraries
RAG improves LLM responses by grounding them in external data instead of just what the model memorized in training. We benchmarked the components a RAG system is built from and gathered the results in one place, with a practical guide to choosing each part of the stack. See our benchmark results for each RAG component,…
RAG Evaluation Tools: Weights & Biases vs Ragas vs DeepEval
When a RAG pipeline retrieves the wrong context, the LLM confidently generates the wrong answer. Context relevance scorers are the primary defense. We benchmarked five tools across 1,460 questions and 14,600+ scored contexts under identical conditions: same judge model (GPT-4o), default configurations, and no custom prompts. Under standard conditions, WandB, TruLens, and Ragas emerged as…
Top 10 Multilingual Embedding Models for RAG
We benchmarked 10 multilingual embedding models on ~606k Amazon reviews across 6 languages (German, English, Spanish, French, Japanese, Chinese). We generated 1,800 queries (300 per language), each referencing concrete details from its source review. Models trained for search (query vs document separation) outperform larger models trained for general text similarity: e5_base (110M params) outperforms models…