Services
Contact Us

LLM Benchmarks

One transparent Intelligence Index combining public benchmarks with AIMultiple's own agentic, RAG and enterprise-reasoning evaluations. See the methodology.

TOP MODEL
Claude Opus 5
Index 86
Best value
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
$0.11 / 1M
Fastest
Trinity Large Thinking
0.12s TTFT
Coverage
151 models
12 benchmarks · 697 eval runs
AIMultiple Intelligence Index

Leaderboard

The highest-scoring models across all benchmarks.

Filter & Sort
#
Model
Index
Agentic RAG
ARC-AGI-1
ARC-AGI-2
ArxivMath
CritPt
FinanceReasoning
FrontierMath
LegalBench
MMMU-Pro
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Terminal-Bench Hard
Text-to-SQL
1
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
86
-989091299073878589--
2
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
81
879893-329083878389-74
3
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
79
989989792990888981856390
4
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
67
919784-308771858187-71
5
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
66
100937271-89568479855877
6
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
66
-9890-31-8889-91--
7
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
62
-9685-14-37878686--
8
GPT-5.5 Pro
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
62
-9785-31-78-----
9
Kimi K3
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
61
939560-238839868285-77
10
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro
OpenAI
60
96----9181----79
Page 1 of 16

Cost$10.00
Latency3.83s
Context1M
TTFT3.83s
ARC-AGI-1
98
ARC-AGI-2
90
ArxivMath
91
CritPt
29
FinanceReasoning
90
FrontierMath
73
LegalBench
87
MMMU-Pro
85
Terminal-Bench 2.1
89

Cost$8.00
Latency4.43s
Context1M
TTFT4.43s
Agentic RAG
87
ARC-AGI-1
98
ARC-AGI-2
93
CritPt
32
FinanceReasoning
90
FrontierMath
83
LegalBench
87
MMMU-Pro
83
Terminal-Bench 2.1
89
Text-to-SQL
74

Cost$20.00
Latency5.28s
Context1M
TTFT5.28s
Agentic RAG
98
ARC-AGI-1
99
ARC-AGI-2
89
ArxivMath
79
CritPt
29
FinanceReasoning
90
FrontierMath
88
LegalBench
89
MMMU-Pro
81
Terminal-Bench 2.1
85
Terminal-Bench Hard
63
Text-to-SQL
90

Cost$4.50
Latency1.92s
Context1M
TTFT1.92s
Agentic RAG
91
ARC-AGI-1
97
ARC-AGI-2
84
CritPt
30
FinanceReasoning
87
FrontierMath
71
LegalBench
85
MMMU-Pro
81
Terminal-Bench 2.1
87
Text-to-SQL
71

Cost$10.00
Latency4.53s
Context1M
TTFT4.53s
Agentic RAG
100
ARC-AGI-1
93
ARC-AGI-2
72
ArxivMath
71
FinanceReasoning
89
FrontierMath
56
LegalBench
84
MMMU-Pro
79
Terminal-Bench 2.1
85
Terminal-Bench Hard
58
Text-to-SQL
77

Cost$20.00
Latency5.44s
Context1M
TTFT5.44s
ARC-AGI-1
98
ARC-AGI-2
90
CritPt
31
FrontierMath
88
LegalBench
89
Terminal-Bench 2.1
91

Cost$1.50
Latency6.05s
Context1M
TTFT6.05s
ARC-AGI-1
96
ARC-AGI-2
85
CritPt
14
FrontierMath
37
LegalBench
87
MMMU-Pro
86
Terminal-Bench 2.1
86

Cost$33.75
Latency3.65s
Context1M
TTFT3.65s
ARC-AGI-1
97
ARC-AGI-2
85
CritPt
31
FrontierMath
78

Cost$5.44
Latency0.93s
Context1M
TTFT0.93s
Agentic RAG
93
ARC-AGI-1
95
ARC-AGI-2
60
CritPt
23
FinanceReasoning
88
FrontierMath
39
LegalBench
86
MMMU-Pro
82
Terminal-Bench 2.1
85
Text-to-SQL
77

Cost$2.00
Latency10.25s
Context1M
TTFT10.25s
Agentic RAG
96
FinanceReasoning
91
FrontierMath
81
Text-to-SQL
79
Page 1 of 16
Frontier Over Time
Intelligence Index by model release date
Cost vs Performance
Blended cost against Intelligence Index
Model × Benchmark
Top models on selected benchmarks
Methodology

How The Index is Built

Each benchmark becomes a 0-100 standing, and the index is the weighted average of those standings. A benchmark a model has not been run on counts as the field average, so scores stay comparable. Index = Terminal-Bench-Science (14%) + FrontierMath (12%) + Frontier-Bench (12%) + ArxivMath (10%) + MMMU-Pro (9%) + ARC-AGI-2 (8%) + CritPt (6%) + FinanceReasoning (5%) + Text-to-SQL (5%) + BioMysteryBench (5%) + ARC-AGI-1 (5%) + Terminal-Bench 2.1 (3%) + Agentic RAG (3%) + Terminal-Bench Hard (2%) + LegalBench (1%).

Recent Updates

Recent Updates

Latest changes to the Intelligence Index, model coverage and AIMultiple benchmark methodology.

Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash

New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.

Tencent

Hy4 preview

New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.

Z AI

GLM 5.3 Flash

New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.

AI Model Release TimelineLast 12 models in 22 days

Key AI model releases from leading providers over the past 22 days.

Provider
OpenAI
OpenAI
04 Sep 2026
GPT-6 Astra +1 moreGPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Astra Pro
Google
Google
02 Sep 2026
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Meta
Meta
21 Aug 2026
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
02 Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 +1 moreMuse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Anthropic
Anthropic
01 Sep 2026
Claude Fable 5.1
Tencent
Tencent
28 Aug 2026
Hy4 preview
Alibaba Cloud
Alibaba Cloud
14 Aug 2026
Qwen3.8 27B
26 Aug 2026
Qwen3.8 Flash
Z AI
Z AI
18 Aug 2026
GLM 5.3
26 Aug 2026
GLM 5.3 Flash

Explore LLM Use Cases, Analyses & Benchmarks

Compare 9 Large Language Models in Healthcare

LLM
Feature Comparison
Sep 4

We benchmarked 9 LLMs using the MedQA dataset, a graduate-level clinical exam benchmark derived from USMLE questions. Each model answered the same multiple-choice clinical scenarios using a standardized prompt, enabling direct comparison of accuracy. We also recorded latency per question by dividing total runtime by the number of MedQA items completed. Benchmark methodology: This benchmark…

Read More
LLM
Insight
Sep 3

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) vs LLMs

We evaluated the performance of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in financial reasoning tasks using a carefully selected dataset. By analyzing a subset of high-quality financial samples, we assess the models’ capabilities in processing and reasoning with multimodal data in the financial domain. The methodology section provides detailed insights into the dataset and evaluation framework employed.…

LLM
Insight
Sep 2

LLM Scaling Laws: Analysis from AI Researchers

Large language models predict the next token based on patterns learned from text data. The term LLM scaling laws refers to empirical regularities that link model performance to the amount of compute, training data, and model parameters used during training. To understand how these relationships influence modern model design in practice, we reviewed findings from…

LLM
Insight
Sep 2

LLM Observability Tools: Weights & Biases, Langsmith

LLM applications have expanded from single-turn chats into multi-step agents that use tools, query databases, and coordinate with other models, making their behavior harder to interpret. LLM observability provides continuous visibility into these complex workflows, helping organizations monitor quality, detect failures, troubleshoot issues, and manage performance and costs. W&B Weave is Weights & Biases‘ LLM…

LLM
Feature Comparison
Sep 2

Cloud LLM vs Local LLMs: Examples & Benefits

Cloud LLMs, powered by advanced models like GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7, offer scalability and accessibility. Conversely, Local LLMs, driven by open-source models such as Llama 4, DeepSeek V4, and Qwen3.6-Plus, ensure stronger privacy and customization. Explore what are cloud LLMs, strengths and weaknesses, most common case studies with real-life examples, and how they differ…

LLM
Benchmark
Sep 1

Audience Simulation: Can LLMs Predict Human Behavior?

In marketing, evaluating how accurately LLMs predict human behavior is crucial for assessing their effectiveness in anticipating audience needs and recognizing the risks of misalignment, ineffective communication, or unintended influence. Audience simulation with LLMs enables the modeling of virtual audiences, helping organizations anticipate reactions to content or products without relying on costly surveys or focus…

LLM
Insight
Sep 1

LLM Fine-Tuning Guide for Enterprises

Follow the links for the specific solutions to your LLM output challenges. If your LLM: The widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) has improved our ability to process human language. However, their generic training often results in suboptimal performance for specific tasks. To overcome this limitation, fine-tuning methods are employed to tailor LLMs to…

LLM
Insight
Sep 1

LLM Market Share: Compare Usage & Adoption

We analyzed LLM market share by combining usage-based data and web visit estimates to show how demand for large language models is distributed across AI labs and AI applications: Read the methodology to see how we measured and calculated these results. The United States dominated web visits across all four months, consistently accounting for 85–95%.…

LLM
Insight
Sep 1

10+ Large Language Model Examples

We have gathered open-source benchmarks to compare leading proprietary and open-source large language models. Choose your use case to find the right model. You can evaluate large language models by examining their benchmark performance and real-world latency (available by clicking each model’s name in the table), and by reviewing their pricing to assess overall efficiency…

LLM
Insight
Aug 31

LLM VRAM Calculator for Self-Hosting

Self-hosting an LLM means running inference on hardware the operator controls rather than via a third-party API, which changes the cost, data control, and privacy profile. Whether a model runs at all depends on memory. The calculator estimates the VRAM or unified memory a model needs to run locally, based on the model, its precision,…

LLM
Feature Comparison
Aug 27

LLM Pricing: Top 15+ Providers Compared

LLM pricing spans four orders of magnitude: the cheapest models launched under $0.03 per million tokens, while frontier reasoning tiers launched at up to $262.50. The chart below tracks launch prices: each point is the average price of the models one size class launched in a calendar quarter, blended 3 parts input to 1 part…