Services
Contactez-nous
Aucun résultat trouvé.
Nazlı Şipi

Nazlı Şipi

Chercheur en IA
30 Articles
Restez informé des dernières technologies B2B
Nazlı est analyste de données chez AIMultiple. Elle possède une expérience en analyse de données acquise dans divers secteurs, où elle a travaillé à la transformation d'ensembles de données complexes en informations exploitables. Elle fait également partie de l'équipe d'évaluation comparative, spécialisée dans les grands modèles de langage (LLM), les agents d'IA et les frameworks d'agents. Nazlı est titulaire d'un master en analyse commerciale de l'Université de Denver.

Derniers articles de Nazlı

DonnéesAvr 29

Web Scraping Craigslist: Meilleurs Scrapers Craigslist

Craigslist’s page structure has stayed largely unchanged for years, simple, mostly static HTML with minimal JavaScript and few anti-bot defenses. To see how well scrapers handle that simplicity, we ran 500 Craigslist job postings through 5 providers, totaling 2,500 requests, and measured each one’s success rate and completion time.

DonnéesAvr 28

Top 5 Amazon Review Scrapers Comparés

To compare how web data scraping providers handle Amazon review extraction, we tested 5 web scraping providers on the same set of Amazon product review URLs, totaling 2,500 requests across all providers. Amazon reviews scraping benchmark Read our benchmark methodology for more detail on our testing process.

DonnéesAvr 28

Meilleures API de scraper Zillow API comparées : Revue de performance

We benchmarked best five web scraping providers on Zillow, one of the top real estate domains, running over 1,250 scrape requests across all providers. Each provider received an identical set of property listing URLs and was evaluated on completion time, success rate, and the number of structured data fields returned per listing.

DonnéesAvr 28

Meilleurs scrapers Airbnb : Bright Data, Apify & Oxylabs

We tested six web scraping providers on Airbnb, sending a total of 1,500 scrape requests across all providers. Each provider was given the same set of vacation rental listing URLs and measured on completion time, success rate, and available metadata fields per listing.

IAAvr 24

Modèles de langage visuel comparés à la reconnaissance d'images

Can advanced Vision Language Models (VLMs) replace traditional image recognition models? To find out, we benchmarked 16 leading models across three paradigms: traditional CNNs (ResNet, EfficientNet), VLMs ( such as GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5), and Cloud APIs (AWS, Google, Azure).

DonnéesAvr 10

Benchmark de Web Crawler pour alimenter les sites web en IA

We benchmarked four crawl APIs across three domains of varying difficulty at three max depth levels (5, 10, 20) with a 1,000-page limit, measuring crawl coverage, execution time, link discovery, markdown link quality, and title extraction accuracy. If you aim to: Web crawlers benchmark You can read our benchmark methodology.

DonnéesAvr 7

Les 6 meilleurs extracteurs LLM

We ran a benchmark to compare how top LLM scraper providers like Bright Data, Oxylabs, and Apify perform with models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode. To ensure reliable results, we ran 1,000 tests per provider with each prompt repeated 10 times for consistency. The top-performing provider is detailed below.

IAFév 2

LLM Outils d'observabilité : Weights & Biases, Langsmith

LLM-based applications are becoming more capable and increasingly complex, making their behavior harder to interpret. Each model output results from prompts, tool interactions, retrieval steps, and probabilistic reasoning that cannot be directly inspected. LLM observability addresses this challenge by providing continuous visibility into how models operate in real-world conditions.

IAJan 28

Outils de détection d'hallucinations IA : W&B Weave & Comet

We benchmarked three hallucination detection tools: Weights & Biases (W&B) Weave HallucinationFree Scorer, Arize Phoenix HallucinationEvaluator, and Comet Opik Hallucination Metric, across 100 test cases. Each tool was evaluated on accuracy, precision, recall, and latency to provide a fair comparison of their real-world performance.

IAJan 22

LLM Benchmark de latence par cas d'utilisation

The effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) is determined not only by their accuracy and capabilities but also by the speed at which they engage with users. We benchmarked the performance of leading language models across various use cases, measuring their response times to user input.