Premium
Services
Premium

AIM Tabular Index

v1.0

We tested 13 tabular models on 19 datasets and scored 1,200 cross-validation runs. The AIM Tabular Index combines AIMultiple's tabular models benchmark with two public leaderboards, TabArena and BeyondArena. See AIM Tabular Index Methodology for further details.

BEST MODELS
Kumo-Tabular, LimiX-2, TabPFN-3.5, TabFM
Tied (confidence interval overlap)
BEST FOR COMMERCIAL USE
Kumo-Tabular
OpenMDW-1.1 license · NVIDIA
BEST CLASSICAL MODELS
CatBoost, LightGBM
Tied (confidence interval overlap)
AIM Tabular Index vs. time per fold
Higher is more accurate, further left is faster. Hover to see each model's type.

Leaderboard

The highest scoring tabular models across all benchmarks, ranked by combined Elo.

Filter & Sort
#
Range
Model
AIM Tabular Index
AIM-Tabular
TabArena
BeyondArena
Seconds per fold
GPU cost, full run (USD)
License
11-4
Kumo-Tabular
Kumo-Tabular
NVIDIA
16921610-1794
1911173914267.61.19OpenMDW-1.1
21-6
LimiX-2
LimiX-2
StableAI
16651571-1774
197617321288111.917.65Non-commercial
31-6
TabPFN-3.5
TabPFN-3.5
Prior Labs
16191558-1692
1836164513764.30.68Non-commercial
41-6
TabFM
TabFM
Google Research
15461451-1647
179815661274173.627.40Non-commercial
52-6
Causilo
Causilo
Nums AI
15201467-1585
1665156913271.40.22Non-commercial
62-8
Mitra-v2
Mitra-v2
Amazon
14981410-1600
14501546-1.50.24Apache-2.0
76-8
TabPFN 3
TabPFN 3
Prior Labs
13621298-1432
1434141712344.20.66Non-commercial
86-8
TabICLv2
TabICLv2
Inria SODA
13401269-1414
1495135211723.10.48BSD-3-Clause
99-10
CatBoost
CatBoost
Yandex
11341081-1188
1133115111180.6CPUApache-2.0
109-11
LightGBM
LightGBM
Microsoft
1037987-1090
11469759900.5CPUMIT
Page 1 of 2

Rank#1
Range1-4
Index interval1610-1794
AIM-Tabular
1911
TabArena
1739
BeyondArena
1426

Rank#2
Range1-6
Index interval1571-1774
AIM-Tabular
1976
TabArena
1732
BeyondArena
1288

Rank#3
Range1-6
Index interval1558-1692
AIM-Tabular
1836
TabArena
1645
BeyondArena
1376

Rank#4
Range1-6
Index interval1451-1647
AIM-Tabular
1798
TabArena
1566
BeyondArena
1274

Rank#5
Range2-6
Index interval1467-1585
AIM-Tabular
1665
TabArena
1569
BeyondArena
1327

Rank#6
Range2-8
Index interval1410-1600
AIM-Tabular
1450
TabArena
1546

Rank#7
Range6-8
Index interval1298-1432
AIM-Tabular
1434
TabArena
1417
BeyondArena
1234

Rank#8
Range6-8
Index interval1269-1414
AIM-Tabular
1495
TabArena
1352
BeyondArena
1172

Rank#9
Range9-10
Index interval1081-1188
AIM-Tabular
1133
TabArena
1151
BeyondArena
1118

Rank#10
Range9-11
Index interval987-1090
AIM-Tabular
1146
TabArena
975
BeyondArena
990
Page 1 of 2
Rating on each benchmark
Each row shows a model's index and its rating per benchmark. Large gaps mean the benchmarks disagree.
Elo on each benchmark, shifted so that default XGBoost = 1000
Average normalized rank by regime
Average rank in six data regimes, by dataset size and feature type.

AIM Tabular Index Methodology

The AIM Tabular Index combines AIMultiple's tabular models benchmark with two public leaderboards, TabArena and BeyondArena.

Scoring

Each benchmark rates models in Elo. TabArena sets the default RandomForest to 1000 Elo, BeyondArena sets the default XGBoost to 1000, and AIM-Tabular sets the average of its models to 1000. We shift each benchmark so that default XGBoost scores 1000, then average the shifted ratings to get the index. On any one benchmark, a 200-point lead predicts a win on about 3 of 4 datasets.

Intervals and rank

Each benchmark gives every model a 95% confidence interval, and we average these the same way as the scores. We order two models only when their intervals do not overlap. Otherwise, rank shows a range. For example, 1-4 means the model can place anywhere from first to fourth.

Configuration

The public benchmarks contribute their default-configuration scores. AIM-Tabular runs every model without tuning or fine-tuning. On TabArena, tuning lifts XGBoost 126 points above its default.

Speed and cost

AIM-Tabular reports seconds per fold (mean time to fit and predict one cross-validation fold) and GPU cost (total fold time at $5.98 per GPU-hour). Foundation models ran on one NVIDIA B200 GPU. Classical models ran on CPU and have no GPU cost.

Benchmarks we used

Download all data

Raw results of 13 data points from the AIMultiple benchmarks this index is built from. Download them as a ZIP file containing one CSV file and a README.

Last updated: October 12, 2026
Download

Want the granular data behind it? Join Premium

Changelog

4 updates
  1. v1.0

    5 models entered the index: Causilo, Kumo-Tabular, LimiX-2, Mitra-v2, TabPFN-3.5.

  2. v1.0

    7 models entered the index: CatBoost, LightGBM, Logistic regression, TabFM, TabICLv2 and 2 more.

  3. v1.0

    Added Mitra to the benchmark; not ranked in the index yet.

  4. v1.0

    AIM-Tabular: Replaced TabPFN with TabPFN 3 in the benchmarked model list.

Explore Tabular Models