Sophos is a popular player in the DLP software and cybersecurity markets. However, our analysis identified some shortcomings of its products. Based on our DLP benchmark of the top 6 DLP products, we identified the top Sophos competitors to assist businesses in finding the best DLP software.
We compare alternatives to:
Sophos Intercept X DLP alternatives
Here we compare the top Sophos DLP alternatives:
Vendor | # of Reviews* | User Rating* | Free Trial
(in days) | Supported
OS | Deployment
Options | VDI
Support |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
160 | 4.5 | ✅ | Windows, MacOS, Linux, Thin Client | On-prem, Public cloud, SaaS | ✅ | |
Trellix DLP (McAfee) | 1,792 | 4.2 | ✅ 60 | Windows, MacOS | On-prem, Public cloud | ❌ |
Acronis Cyber Protect | 705 | 4.5 | ✅
30 | Windows, MacOS, Linux | Public cloud, SaaS | ✅ |
Sophos Intercept X | 480 | 4.5 | ✅
30 | Windows, MacOS, Linux, Unix | On-prem, SaaS | ✅ |
Safetica DLP | 263 | 4.7 | ❌ | Windows, MacOS, Linux | On-prem, Public cloud, SaaS | ❌ |
Teramind DLP | 223 | 4.5 | ✅
7 | Windows, MacOS | Public cloud, SaaS | ✅ |
Symantec DLP by Broadcom | 156 | 4.3 | ❌ | Windows, MacOS | On-prem, Public cloud, SaaS | ✅ |
Forcepoint DLP | 76 | 4.3 | ❌ | Windows, MacOS, Linux | On-prem, Public cloud, SaaS | ❌ |
Digital Guardian Endpoint DLP | 63 | 3.7 | ❌ | Windows, MacOS | Public cloud, SaaS | ❌ |
Microsoft Purview DLP | 36 | 4.4 | ✅
90 | Windows, MacOS | Public cloud, SaaS | ❌ |
* Source: Leading B2B review platforms.
** The lowest rate for the most basic package in USD for one user/computer, billed annually.
Thin client: A lightweight software layer specifically designed to manage a network-based computing environment.
VDI: Virtual desktop infrastructure.
Requirements for inclusion in the table:
- Relevance of their offerings
- 100+ employees
Sorting: Vendors with links to their websites are sponsors of AIMultiple and are listed at the top. The remaining products are ranked based on their total number of reviews.
Sophos complete security platform alternatives
Vendor | Offerings | # of Employees |
---|---|---|
Sophos | – Endpoint Security – Network Security – Cloud Security | 1K-5K |
Cisco Secure Endpoint | – Endpoint Protection – Extended Detection & Response – Mobile Device Management | 10K+ |
Palo Alto Networks | – Endpoint Security – Cloud-Native Application Protection – Network Security | 10K+ |
Trend Micro | – Endpoint Security – Network Security – Email security | 5K-10K |
SentinelOne | – Endpoint Protection – Cloud Security – Identity Protection | 1K-5K |
WithSecure | – Endpoint Protection – Managed Detection & Response – Cloud Protection | 1K-5K |
WatchGuard | – Endpoint Security – Network Security | 1K-5K |
Bitdefender | – Network Security – Cloud Security – Threat Intelligence | 1K-5K |
Cybereason | – Endpoint Security – Threat Intelligence | 1K-5K |
Heimdal Security | – Endpoint Security – Patch & Asset Management – Privilege Access Management | 51-200 |
Sorting: The vendors above are ranked based on the number of employees, with Sophos at the top.
Sophos review and shortcomings
Sophos Ltd. is a British security software and hardware company headquartered in Abingdon, England. Founded in 1985 by Jan Hruska and Peter Lammer, Sophos operates in the global cybersecurity market. The company provides a comprehensive range of products, including data loss prevention (DLP) solutions with its Intercept X product.
Shortcomings
We tested Sophos DLP and analyzed user reviews from leading review platforms to identify the following shortcomings.
1. Weak customer support
- Multiple user reviews suggest that Sophos customer support needs improvement. Users require faster and more sophisticated assistance.
- The stability of Sophos’s engine should be enhanced, as frequent updates and subsequent endpoint reboots disrupt live operations.
2. Expensive
- While users found the system easy to install, they were unhappy with the product prices.
3. Software issues
- The product may not function as promised in some environments, disrupting essential applications like Outlook, Excel, Word, PowerPoint, SharePoint, and Adobe Reader.
- Users experienced a high rate of false positives that overloaded their logs.
- The IMS Console is difficult to use. It offers extensive data but lacks actionable insights, and it does not provide metrics, inquiry, or reporting features.
4. Ineffective data classification
- Automated data classification was not effective in our tests, misclassifying risky emails with confidential attachments as low-risk.
- Although customization options are available, the data classification features did not meet expectations.
5. Limited default policies
- Default/base policies for peripherals and email did not stop confidential file transfers. However, custom policies blocked them effectively.
- The application control feature did restrict file transfers to platforms like Google Drive, but overall, the default policies were insufficient.
4. Missing user activity features
- Sophos does not offer user screen recording capabilities, which can be used to record when a user performs a task that violates the DLP policies. This feature is provided in some solutions like Teramind.
5. Administrative shortcomings
- The agent file sometimes disrupts productivity since it is difficult to disable or uninstall. It quarantined our computer.
- The platform does provide effective tamper protection and audit trail logging. However, the tamper protection feature sometimes disrupts productivity since it is difficult to disable or uninstall. It quarantined our computer.
Detailed analysis of DLP alternatives

1. Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys
Based in North Carolina, Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys (now part of Netwrix) is the best alternative to Sophos based on our benchmarking tests. Its device control feature is the most comprehensive in our analysis and user reviews.
Best for: Organizations prioritizing device control and granular endpoint security.
Key features
- Comprehensive device control: Endpoint Protector offers control over 30+ types of removable devices and peripherals, including USBs, Bluetooth devices, smartphones, and more. This is the highest among all competitors. Its data classification was also accurate and performed well during our tests.
- Panic functionality: Instantly lock/wipe devices during security incidents.
- Accurate data classification: AI-driven detection of PII, financial data, and IP protects sensitive data from unauthorized access and theft.
Strengths
- Smooth implementation: CoSoSys’s EPP offers a comprehensive DLP solution and good customer support. Reviews also highlight that its implementation team is helpful but can be improved.
- Thin client support: Ideal for virtualized environments (e.g., Citrix, VMware).
Weaknesses
- Limited cloud-native features: Less useful for cloud apps compared to competitors.
2. Symantec DLP by Broadcom
Another viable alternative to Sophos is Symantec, which is now part of Broadcom and is headquartered in California. It offers a DLP (Data Loss Prevention) solution to safeguard confidential data from cyber-attacks across various channels and environments. Symantec also claims to deliver various cybersecurity products, encompassing endpoint security, web and email security, and identity protection solutions.
Best for: Enterprises requiring robust data protection with regulatory compliance.
Key Features:
- Automated Data Classification: Streamlines data management by automatically categorizing data, enhancing regulatory compliance and overall efficiency.
- Advanced Security Measures: Effectively protects the enterprise’s sensitive information (e.g., social security numbers).
- User Education: Provides tools and guidance to help educate users on DLP best practices.
- Network Prevent Controls: Incorporates features designed to stop data leakage despite some functional restrictions.
Strengths:
- Effective Data Protection: Delivers strong security capabilities, ensuring sensitive data is well-protected throughout the organization.
- Regulatory Compliance: Facilitates adherence to compliance standards through efficient data classification and management.
Weaknesses:
- Configuration Hurdles: The setup and configuration process can be complex and demanding. It also has competitive cloud storage costs.
- Feature Restrictions: Certain functionalities, particularly within the Network Prevent features, face limitations.
For more on Symantec and its alternatives.
3. Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP, founded in 1994, is headquartered in Austin, Texas. The company is a suitable alternative to Sophos because it claims to specialize in data loss prevention solutions aimed at helping organizations secure their sensitive data and prevent unauthorized access or leaks. Forcepoint’s DLP offerings include tools for monitoring and controlling data transfers across networks, endpoints, and cloud environments.
Best for: Enterprises focused on network security and regulatory compliance.
Key features
- Activity monitoring policies: Adjusts controls based on user behavior and context. Enables security administrators to identify real-time sensitive data exposure within applications and trace user behaviors leading up to incidents.
- Cross-platform visibility: Monitors data across email, cloud, and endpoints.
- Compliance templates: Pre-built frameworks for GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.
Strengths
- User-friendly UI: Simplified policy management for non-technical teams.
Weaknesses
- No Linux support: Limits compatibility for tech-heavy industries.
- Weak OCR: Struggles with image-based document analysis.
For more on Forcepoint DLP alternatives.
FAQs for Sophos competitors
Further reading
- Tackling Critical Data Protection Challenges
- Top 10 LLM DLP Best Practices
- Top 7 AI DLP Best Practices with Case Studies

Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE and NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and resources that referenced AIMultiple.
Throughout his career, Cem served as a tech consultant, tech buyer and tech entrepreneur. He advised enterprises on their technology decisions at McKinsey & Company and Altman Solon for more than a decade. He also published a McKinsey report on digitalization.
He led technology strategy and procurement of a telco while reporting to the CEO. He has also led commercial growth of deep tech company Hypatos that reached a 7 digit annual recurring revenue and a 9 digit valuation from 0 within 2 years. Cem's work in Hypatos was covered by leading technology publications like TechCrunch and Business Insider.
Cem regularly speaks at international technology conferences. He graduated from Bogazici University as a computer engineer and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.

Be the first to comment
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.