Premium
Services
Premium
Nazlı Şipi

Nazlı Şipi

AI Researcher
41 Articles
Stay up-to-date on B2B Tech
Nazlı is a data analyst at AIMultiple. She has prior experience in data analysis across various industries, where she worked on transforming complex datasets into actionable insights.

She is also part of the benchmark team, focusing on web data scraping, large language models (LLMs), AI agents, and agentic frameworks.

Nazlı holds a Master’s degree in Business Analytics from the University of Denver.

Latest Articles from Nazlı

Data
Benchmark
Oct 22

We Benchmarked the Best Web Scraping APIs

We benchmarked web data providers in categories ranging from e-commerce and social media to jobs, real estate and food delivery, sending more than 600,000 requests to 10,000+ live domains to see how they handle enterprise data collection. Our web data scraping page summarizes the results of all our web data benchmarks in one place. Below,…

Data
Benchmark
Oct 22

Web Crawler Benchmark to Feed Websites to AI

We benchmarked four crawl APIs across three domains of varying difficulty at three max depth levels (5, 10, 20) with a 1,000-page limit, measuring crawl coverage, execution time, link discovery, markdown link quality, and title extraction accuracy. If you aim to: You can read our benchmark methodology. Firecrawl consistently crawled around 100 pages on theregister.com…

AI
Benchmark
Oct 20

Compare Multimodal AI Models on Visual Reasoning

We benchmarked 40 leading multimodal AI models on visual reasoning using 200 visual-based questions. The evaluation consisted of two tracks: 100 chart understanding questions testing data visualization interpretation, and 100 visual logic questions assessing pattern recognition and spatial reasoning. See our benchmark methodology to learn our testing procedures. Every model scores lower on visual logic…

Data
Insight
Oct 14

Best AI Web Scraping Tools Benchmarked

We benchmarked top AI web scraping tools with 25,000 requests, 5,000 per tool, across 500 URLs on each of 10 of the most visited domains to see their performance, and also compared how each one leverages AI. See the benchmark methodology section for more details on the testing process. For each domain we asked for…

Agentic AI
Benchmark
Oct 14

15 AI Agent Observability Tools: AgentOps & Langfuse

We tested 15 observability platforms for LLM applications and AI agents. Each platform was implemented hands-on through setting up workflows, configuring integrations, and running test scenarios. We benchmarked 4 observability tools to measure whether they introduce overhead in production pipelines. We also demonstrated a LangChain observability tutorial using Langfuse. We integrated each observability platform into…

AI
Feature Comparison
Oct 14

Top LLMOps Tools & Compare them to MLOPs

LLMOps platforms handle the operational side of running large language models: deployment, monitoring, evaluation, and cost management. We examined top LLMOps tools, their core features, pricing models, and how they differ from each other to help identify the best fit for various use cases. A breakdown of each metric is provided below: LLMOps platforms support…

AI
Benchmark
Oct 14

AI Hallucination Detection Tools: W&B Weave & Comet

We benchmarked three hallucination detection tools: W&B Weave HallucinationFree Scorer (part of CoreWeave Forge, formerly Weights & Biases), Arize Phoenix HallucinationEvaluator, and Comet Opik Hallucination Metric, across 100 test cases. Each tool was evaluated on accuracy, precision, recall, and latency. We tested 100 responses (50 correct, 50 hallucinated) from factual Q&A scenarios against their source…

AI
Benchmark
Oct 13

LLM Latency Benchmark by Use Cases

You can find details on how we measured latency here. We report reasoning and non-reasoning models separately. Reasoning models spend several seconds thinking before the first visible answer, so comparing them directly with non-reasoning models on latency would be misleading. Some models also change behavior by task: GPT-5.2 answers Q&A without reasoning but reasons on…

Agentic AI
Benchmark
Sep 21

Mobile AI Agents Tested Across 65 Real-World Tasks

We spent 3 days benchmarking four mobile AI agents (DroidRun, Mobile-Agent, AutoDroid, and AppAgent) across 65 real-world tasks using an Android emulator with applications such as calendar management, contact creation, photo capture, audio recording, and file operations. See benchmark results including real-world performance comparison, costs and execution times: Highest success rate (43%) with high cost…

AI
Insight
Sep 2

LLM Observability Tools: Weights & Biases, Langsmith

LLM applications have expanded from single-turn chats into multi-step agents that use tools, query databases, and coordinate with other models, making their behavior harder to interpret. LLM observability provides continuous visibility into these complex workflows, helping organizations monitor quality, detect failures, troubleshoot issues, and manage performance and costs. W&B Weave is Weights & Biases‘ LLM…