Apify entered the index.
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
v1.3Provider success rates, response times and metadata coverage across our web scraping benchmarks. See the methodology.
Leaderboard
Filter by tool type and must-have requirements. Sort any column.
# | Model | Index | Social media | Search engines | Video & streaming | Reviews | Food delivery | App stores | Real estate | Job postings | Google Maps | Web unblocker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data | 91.7 | 86.8 | - | 98.9 | 78.0 | 94.3 | 99.8 | 88.5 | 92.1 | - | 94.8 |
| 2 | Apify | 91.3 | 99.9 | - | 99.6 | 98.6 | 55.7 | - | 94.0 | - | 100.0 | - |
| 3 | Zyte | 88.2 | 99.3 | 72.1 | 99.6 | 65.0 | 82.2 | 99.5 | 65.6 | 64.8 | 99.9 | 95.4 |
| 4 | Nimble | 82.8 | 82.0 | 50.7 | 97.7 | 52.4 | 84.9 | 99.7 | 86.0 | 71.1 | 98.9 | 95.6 |
| 5 | Oxylabs | 81.0 | 91.6 | 97.4 | 99.7 | 56.2 | 90.8 | 99.6 | 71.1 | 64.6 | 94.4 | - |
| 6 | Decodo | 74.1 | 81.9 | 84.7 | 99.5 | 35.9 | 90.0 | 99.7 | 74.8 | 64.5 | - | - |
Cost vs. performance
Web scraper cost across our 100 e-commerce domain benchmark, and web unblocker cost across 10,000 domains. Volume-adjusted per successful request.
Avg is the effective per-1k rate we paid in our benchmark, volume-adjusted with each provider's cheapest available plan. Min is the cheapest tier each provider offers. Max is the most expensive tier.
Provider profile
Price per successful page, completion time, metadata depth, domains returning structured JSON and AI readiness for each provider.
# | Model | Domains with JSON | Avg metadata fields | $ per 1k | Completion time (s) | AI ready |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data | 24 | 29 | 1.5 | 22.8 | 79 |
| 2 | Apify | 10 | 38 | 13.7 | 19.9 | 55 |
| 3 | Zyte | 0 | 1 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 60 |
| 4 | Nimble | 6 | 1 | 1.0 | 14.6 | 70 |
| 5 | Oxylabs | 12 | 1 | 2.0 | 18.0 | 71 |
| 6 | Decodo | 6 | 3 | 2.4 | 20.1 | 64 |
Behaviour under load
Success rate tracked at 1, 100, 500 and 5,000 parallel requests.
Anti-bot landscape
Which vendor guards your targets predicts your success rate.
Web unblocks across the top 10k domains
Scraping APIs across the top 10k domains
Domain coverage by provider
Which of the Tranco top 100 domains each provider can scrape, and for which of them it also returns structured JSON. Scraping support comes from our web unblocker benchmark; JSON support comes from a separate test of parsed output on the same domains. Domains are sorted by coverage, so the ones most providers support appear at the top.
| Domain | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| google.com | |||||||
| chatgpt.com | |||||||
| bing.com | |||||||
| amazon.com | |||||||
| facebook.com | |||||||
| tiktok.com | |||||||
| youtube.com | |||||||
| baidu.com | |||||||
| googlevideo.com | |||||||
| yandex.ru | |||||||
| apple.com | |||||||
| github.com | |||||||
| instagram.com | |||||||
| microsoft.com | |||||||
| office.com | |||||||
| twitter.com | |||||||
| wikipedia.org | |||||||
| yahoo.com | |||||||
| youtu.be | |||||||
| zoom.us | |||||||
| Domains scraped | 68 | 12 | 6 | 73 | 67 | 10 | 13 |
✓ The provider scrapes the domain. ✅ The provider scrapes the domain and returns structured JSON. ✕ The provider does not scrape the domain. Of the providers in this table, only Bright Data, Nimble and Zyte ran in the web unblocker benchmark; for the other providers the table shows JSON support only.
Web data providers markdown output performance
Markdown extraction success rate and completion time from our web unblocker benchmark, and the output formats each provider returns.
| Provider | Markdown | HTML |
|---|---|---|
Success rate by page type and concurrency
Product pages and search pages behave differently on the same domain.
Frequently asked questions
Methodology
The index re-uses the raw results of every web data benchmark we published. A benchmark counts if it tests web data providers and records the outcome of each request. A provider's index score is the average of its success rates across the benchmarks it ran in. Every benchmark carries equal weight, so a 1,400-request study counts as much as a 260,000-request one. Success means the response returned the target page with the content we asked for. We check that against bot pages and empty shells, so a 200 response with a challenge page counts as a failure. If a provider was never tested in a benchmark, we show a dash instead of a zero.
Targets come from the Tranco list, which ranks domains by averaging several traffic rankings. We remove dead, adult, gambling and malicious hosts before testing. Domains are grouped into categories: e-commerce, social media, search engines, video and streaming, travel, reviews, food delivery, app stores, real estate, job postings, news and publishing, developer and SaaS, finance, and government and education. Domain coverage and structured JSON support are checked on the top 100. Cost is per 1,000 successful pages, not per 1,000 requests sent. We take the cheapest plan a provider offers at that volume and divide by the success rate we measured. Completion time is how long one request takes from start to finish. Metadata fields are the parsed fields a provider returns when it answers with JSON. AI ready is the share of responses that came back as clean markdown. The anti-bot results come from two of our runs, the unblocker benchmark across 10,000 domains and the e-commerce benchmark across the top 100 domains, with each domain labelled by the vendor guarding it. Whiskers are 95% confidence intervals.
Changelog
15 updates- v1.3
Apify entered the index.
- v1.3
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: The index is now built from the raw results of every published web data benchmark, each weighted equally. Version updated to v1.3.
- v1.2
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Each benchmark is now scored on its own, and providers with too few samples are left out. Version updated to v1.2.
- v1.1
5 providers entered the index: Bright Data, Decodo, Nimble, Oxylabs, Zyte.
- v1.1
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Providers are now scored per benchmark category and per tool type (scraping API or web unblocker). Version updated to v1.1.
- v1.0
Ethical web data benchmark: Added a Methodology limitations section at the end of the benchmark.
Explore Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
- Web Data ScrapingInsightSep 17
Is Web Scraping Legal? Laws & Best Practices
Legal regulations have changed in the web scraping market. While litigation once focused on unauthorized access, new lawsuits related to AI training and technical workarounds are shaping acceptable practices. Disclaimer: Our work is for informational purposes and not legal advice; please get professional legal advice for specific guidance. Web scraping is legal if you scrape…
- Web Data ScrapingBenchmarkSep 15
Ethical & Compliant Web Data Benchmark
As enterprises scale their web data operations, compliance, data, and risk executives increasingly evaluate the associated ethical, reputational, and legal risks. We benchmarked 5 leading web data collection services across 3 dimensions and tested each service with more than 20 potentially unethical scenarios. Our work helps you assess the ethical standing of your data collection…
- Scraping ToolsFeature ComparisonSep 10
Best ScrapeBox Alternatives
ScrapeBox is a Windows and macOS desktop application used for SEO tasks such as search engine scraping, keyword harvesting, link building, comment posting, and backlink checking. However, it is a desktop GUI tool, not an API, and the cost is higher once premium plugins, proxies, and a CAPTCHA service are added. So alternatives are grouped…
- Web DatasetsFeature ComparisonAug 27
LinkedIn Datasets: Profile & Company Data
LinkedIn datasets can be categorized into profile data and company data: It’s important to know the different types of LinkedIn data available when buying from a verified provider or seeking a specific company dataset. Common fields across all providers: The following fields are present in all three providers and were removed from the tables above…
- Scraping ToolsBenchmarkAug 21
Top 6 LLM Scrapers: ChatGPT, Perplexity & Gemini
We benchmarked how the top LLM scraper providers, including Bright Data, Oxylabs, and Apify, perform at extracting outputs from LLM platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode. To ensure reliable results, we ran 1,000 tests per provider, repeating each prompt 10 times for consistency. The top-performing provider is detailed below. Providers missing…
- Web DatasetsOpen World EvaluationAug 14
Top 5 Social Media Datasets
We compared five leading social media data providers, focusing on the types of social data they offer and the platforms they include. For clarity, these providers fall into two groups: These vendors deliver raw or enriched content (Posts, Comments, Engagement). These vendors focus on public profile information and professional history. Bright Data is a leading…
- Web DatasetsOpen World EvaluationAug 14
Best Indeed Dataset Providers
For getting Indeed data, the market breaks down into three options: do-it-yourself scraping infrastructure, more flexible infrastructure, or managed third-party datasets. Each option comes with different tradeoffs around speed, coverage, reliability, maintenance, and control. Compare Indeed dataset services by pricing structure: Bright Data offers Indeed job listings and company info datasets with detailed fields, including…
- Scraping ToolsFeature ComparisonAug 14
Best Python Web Scraping Libraries
Based on my over a decade of software development experience, including my role as CTO at AIMultiple, where I led data collection from ~80,000 web domains, I have selected the top Python web scraping libraries. BeautifulSoup is a Python library for parsing HTML and XML and extracting data from web pages. It sits on top…