Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Providers are now ranked only if they were tested in at least 80% of the benchmarks. Version updated to v1.5.
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
v1.5400,000+ requests across 10,000+ most popular domains used to measure 5 providers' success rates, response times and metadata coverage. See AIM Web Data Scraping Index Methodology for further details.
Leaderboard
Filter by tool type and must-have requirements. Sort any column.
# | Model | Index | Social media | Search engines | Video & streaming | Reviews | Food delivery | App stores | Real estate | Job postings | Google Maps | Web unblocker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data | 91.7 | 86.8 | - | 98.9 | 78.0 | 94.3 | 99.8 | 88.5 | 92.1 | - | 94.8 |
| 2 | Zyte | 88.2 | 99.3 | 72.1 | 99.6 | 65.0 | 82.2 | 99.5 | 65.6 | 64.8 | 99.9 | 95.4 |
| 3 | Nimble | 82.8 | 82.0 | 50.7 | 97.7 | 52.4 | 84.9 | 99.7 | 86.0 | 71.1 | 98.9 | 95.6 |
| 4 | Oxylabs | 81.0 | 91.6 | 97.4 | 99.7 | 56.2 | 90.8 | 99.6 | 71.1 | 64.6 | 94.4 | - |
| 5 | Decodo | 74.1 | 81.9 | 84.7 | 99.5 | 35.9 | 90.0 | 99.7 | 74.8 | 64.5 | - | - |
Cost vs. performance
Web scraper cost across our 100 e-commerce domain benchmark, and web unblocker cost across 10,000 domains. Volume-adjusted per successful request.
Avg is the effective per-1k rate we paid in our benchmark, volume-adjusted with each provider's cheapest available plan. Min is the cheapest tier each provider offers. Max is the most expensive tier.
Web unblocker
Web scraper
Provider profile
Price per successful page, completion time, metadata depth, domains returning structured JSON and AI readiness for each provider.
# | Model | Domains with JSON | Avg metadata fields | $ per 1k | Completion time (s) | AI ready |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data | 24 | 33 | 1.5 | 22.8 | 79 |
| 2 | Zyte | 0 | 5 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 60 |
| 3 | Nimble | 6 | 5 | 1.0 | 14.6 | 70 |
| 4 | Oxylabs | 12 | 6 | 2.0 | 18.0 | 71 |
| 5 | Decodo | 6 | 9 | 2.4 | 20.1 | 64 |
Behavior under load
Success rate tracked at 1, 100, 500 and 5,000 parallel requests.
Anti-bot landscape
Which vendor guards your targets predicts your success rate.
Web unblocks across the top 10k domains
Scraping APIs across the top 10k domains
Domain coverage by provider
Which of the Tranco top 100 domains each provider can scrape, and for which of them it also returns structured JSON. Scraping support comes from our web unblocker benchmark; JSON support comes from a separate test of parsed output on the same domains. Domains are sorted by coverage, so the ones most providers support appear at the top.
| Domain | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| google.com | |||||||
| chatgpt.com | |||||||
| bing.com | |||||||
| amazon.com | |||||||
| facebook.com | |||||||
| tiktok.com | |||||||
| youtube.com | |||||||
| baidu.com | |||||||
| googlevideo.com | |||||||
| yandex.ru | |||||||
| apple.com | |||||||
| github.com | |||||||
| instagram.com | |||||||
| microsoft.com | |||||||
| office.com | |||||||
| twitter.com | |||||||
| wikipedia.org | |||||||
| yahoo.com | |||||||
| youtu.be | |||||||
| zoom.us | |||||||
| Domains scraped | 68 | 12 | 6 | 73 | 67 | 10 | 13 |
✓ The provider scrapes the domain. ✅ The provider scrapes the domain and returns structured JSON. ✕ The provider does not scrape the domain. Of the providers in this table, only Bright Data, Nimble and Zyte ran in the web unblocker benchmark; for the other providers the table shows JSON support only.
Web data providers markdown output performance
Markdown extraction success rate and completion time from our web unblocker benchmark, and the output formats each provider returns.
| Provider | Markdown | HTML |
|---|---|---|
This table shows which output formats each provider supports. It is not a test result: the markdown test above covered Bright Data, Exa, Firecrawl and Nimble.
Success rate by page type and concurrency
Product pages and search pages behave differently on the same domain.
Frequently asked questions
AIM Web Data Scraping Index Methodology
The index re-uses the raw results of every web data benchmark we published. A benchmark counts if it tests web data providers and records the outcome of each request. A provider's index score is the average of its success rates across the benchmarks it ran in. A provider is ranked only if it was tested in at least 80% of the benchmarks, the same rule the SDG Index uses. Providers below that still appear in the charts, without a rank. Every benchmark carries equal weight, so a 1,400-request study counts as much as a 260,000-request one. Success means the response returned the target page with the content we asked for. We check that against bot pages and empty shells, so a 200 response with a challenge page counts as a failure. If a provider was never tested in a benchmark, we show a dash instead of a zero.
Targets come from the Tranco list, which ranks domains by averaging several traffic rankings. We remove dead, adult, gambling and malicious hosts before testing. Domains are grouped into categories: e-commerce, social media, search engines, video and streaming, travel, reviews, food delivery, app stores, real estate, job postings, news and publishing, developer and SaaS, finance, and government and education. Domain coverage and structured JSON support are checked on the top 100. Cost is per 1,000 successful pages, not per 1,000 requests sent. We take the cheapest plan a provider offers at that volume and divide by the success rate we measured. Completion time is how long one request takes from start to finish. Metadata fields are the parsed fields a provider returns when it answers with JSON. AI ready is the share of responses that came back as clean markdown. The anti-bot results come from two of our runs, the unblocker benchmark across 10,000 domains and the e-commerce benchmark across the top 100 domains, with each domain labelled by the vendor guarding it. Whiskers are 95% confidence intervals.
Raw results of 330.8 thousand data points from the AIMultiple benchmarks this index is built from. Download them as a ZIP file containing 12 CSV files and a README.
Want the granular data behind it? Join Premium
Changelog
16 updates- v1.5
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Providers are now ranked only if they were tested in at least 80% of the benchmarks. Version updated to v1.5.
- v1.4
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Average metadata fields now count only responses that returned parsed JSON; raw HTML answers no longer count as zero fields. Version updated to v1.4.
- v1.3
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: The index is now built from the raw results of every published web data benchmark, each weighted equally. Version updated to v1.3.
- v1.2
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Each benchmark is now scored on its own, and providers with too few samples are left out. Version updated to v1.2.
- v1.1
5 providers entered the index: Bright Data, Decodo, Nimble, Oxylabs, Zyte.
- v1.1
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Providers are now scored per benchmark category and per tool type (scraping API or web unblocker). Version updated to v1.1.
- v1.0
Ethical web data benchmark: Added a Methodology limitations section at the end of the benchmark.
Explore Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
- Scraping ToolsBenchmarkOct 22
We Benchmarked the Best Web Scraping APIs
We benchmarked web data providers in categories ranging from e-commerce and social media to jobs, real estate and food delivery, sending more than 600,000 requests to 10,000+ live domains to see how they handle enterprise data collection. Our web data scraping page summarizes the results of all our web data benchmarks in one place. Below,…
- Scraping ToolsBenchmarkOct 22
Web Crawler Benchmark to Feed Websites to AI
We benchmarked four crawl APIs across three domains of varying difficulty at three max depth levels (5, 10, 20) with a 1,000-page limit, measuring crawl coverage, execution time, link discovery, markdown link quality, and title extraction accuracy. If you aim to: You can read our benchmark methodology. Firecrawl consistently crawled around 100 pages on theregister.com…
- Anti-BlockingInsightOct 14
How to Bypass CAPTCHA (reCAPTCHA & hCaptcha)
Modern CAPTCHA and human-verification systems use a mix of challenge-response tests, browser signals, server-side token validation, and adaptive challenges. Attempting to bypass CAPTCHA on third-party websites can violate the terms of service or trigger account or IP blocks. The better approach is to use official APIs, reduce request rates, or implement a modern bot-management solution…
- Scraping ToolsBenchmarkOct 14
Remote Browsers: Web Infra for AI Agents Compared
AI agents rely on remote browsers to automate web tasks without being blocked by anti-scraping measures. The performance of this browser infrastructure is critical to an agent’s success. We benchmarked 8 providers on success rate, speed, and features. To do this, we executed 160 automated tasks, running 4 distinct scenarios 5 times for each service…
- Scraping Use CasesSep 28
No-Code Financial Data Scraping: Tools & Compliance Tips
While official financial data providers do offer APIs, these are often limited in scope, access, or flexibility for real-time or niche data needs. Financial data scraping has become a common approach to collecting such information, typically using technologies such as web scrapers, headless browsers, and open-source crawlers, which can be paired with proxy/unblocking services when…
- Web Data ScrapingBenchmarkSep 28
Large-Scale Web Scraping: 7 Providers Benchmarked
We ran two benchmarks against live websites, from 5 to 5,000 concurrent requests. The first sent 260,000 requests through four web unblockers across the Tranco top 10,000 domains, plus a markdown extraction test on 10,000 URLs. The second fetched 65,000 product and search pages from each of five scraping providers across 100 e-commerce domains. Metrics…
- E-commerce ScrapingBenchmarkSep 28
E-Commerce Scraper: 4 Providers Benchmarked
We benchmarked four web data providers across 100 e-commerce domains, fetching 65,000 product and search pages each at 5 to 5,000 concurrent requests. Averaged across concurrency levels, Bright Data reached the highest success rate (76%) at a 16-second median. Apify recorded the highest median response time at 46 seconds. Response time is reported as the…
- Web DatasetsOpen World EvaluationSep 28
Best Glassdoor Datasets
Glassdoor datasets offer useful insights into job listings, employer reviews, and salaries, but they are not the exclusive source of labor-market or employer-brand data. We review the four top providers of Glassdoor datasets: Bright Data, Coresignal, Oxylabs, and Actowiz. Our evaluation covers each provider’s dataset structure, extraction techniques, update schedules, delivery options, and pricing models.…