Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
Provider success rates, response times and metadata coverage across our web scraping benchmarks.
Leaderboard
Filter by tool type and must-have requirements. Sort any column.
# | Model | Index | E-commerce | Social media | Search engines | Video & streaming | Travel | Reviews | Food delivery | App stores | Real estate | Job postings | News & publishing | Developer & SaaS | Finance | Government & education | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data All tool types | 86.7 | 81.4 | 70.4 | 60.6 | 98.5 | 98.9 | 78 | 64.1 | 99.8 | 88.5 | 90.6 | 97.3 | 96.3 | 91.5 | 91.8 | 96.8 |
| 2 | Oxylabs All tool types | 77.2 | 19.8 | 70.4 | 0 | 99.7 | 89.1 | 56.2 | 91.7 | 99.6 | 71.1 | 77.5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Apify All tool types | 75.4 | 18 | - | - | 99.6 | 99.2 | 98.6 | 44.6 | - | 94 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | Nimble All tool types | 74 | 71.7 | 64 | 0 | 97.7 | 19.3 | 52.4 | 68 | 99.7 | 86 | 69.6 | 99.6 | 99.5 | - | 97 | 96.9 |
| 5 | Zyte All tool types | 72.5 | 25.5 | - | 6 | 99.6 | 96.3 | 65 | 75.9 | 99.5 | 65.6 | 57.8 | 97.6 | 98.6 | - | 96.7 | 97.8 |
| 6 | Decodo All tool types | 69.5 | 39.6 | 70.1 | 0 | 99.5 | 83.2 | 35.9 | 91.3 | 99.7 | 74.8 | 77.4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Cost vs. performance
Web scraper cost across our 100 e-commerce domain benchmark, and web unblocker cost across 10,000 domains. Volume-adjusted per successful request.
Avg is the effective per-1k rate we paid in our benchmark, volume-adjusted with each provider's cheapest available plan. Min is the cheapest tier each provider offers. Max is the most expensive tier.
Provider profile
Price per successful page, completion time, metadata depth, domains returning structured JSON and AI readiness for each provider.
# | Model | Domains with JSON | Avg metadata fields | $ per 1k | Completion time (s) | AI ready |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data All tool types | 24 | 28 | 1.5 | 18 | 79 |
| 2 | Oxylabs All tool types | 12 | 4 | 2 | 14.2 | 71 |
| 3 | Apify All tool types | 10 | 42 | 13.7 | 26.7 | 55 |
| 4 | Nimble All tool types | 6 | 0 | 1 | 12.6 | 68 |
| 5 | Zyte All tool types | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13.6 | 60 |
| 6 | Decodo All tool types | 6 | 0 | 2.4 | 16.5 | 64 |
| 7 | SerpApi All tool types | 13 | 28 | - | 1.1 | - |
Behaviour under load
Success rate tracked at 1, 100, 500 and 5,000 parallel requests.
Anti-bot landscape
Which vendor guards your targets predicts your success rate.
Web unblocks across the top 10k domains
Scraping APIs across the top 10k domains
JSON coverage
Each provider was tested against the Tranco top 100 domains for whether it returns structured JSON rather than raw markup. A double check mark means the provider returned parsed structured fields for that domain; a cross means it did not. Domains are sorted by coverage, so the ones supported by the most providers appear at the top.
| Domain | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| google.com | |||||||
| chatgpt.com | |||||||
| facebook.com | |||||||
| youtube.com | |||||||
| amazon.com | |||||||
| bing.com | |||||||
| tiktok.com | |||||||
| googlevideo.com | |||||||
| microsoft.com | |||||||
| apple.com | |||||||
| instagram.com | |||||||
| fbcdn.net | |||||||
| twitter.com | |||||||
| office.com | |||||||
| github.com | |||||||
| wikipedia.org | |||||||
| youtu.be | |||||||
| yahoo.com | |||||||
| zoom.us | |||||||
| baidu.com | |||||||
| Domains with JSON | 24 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 13 |
Across the Tranco top 100 domains, Bright Data returns structured JSON for 24, SerpApi for 13, Oxylabs for 12, Apify for 10, and Decodo and Nimble for 6 each - Zyte returned none in this sample.
Success rate by page type and concurrency
Product pages and search pages behave differently on the same domain.
Start here
No provider wins every column. Choose the constraint that actually binds you.
Methodology
The index re-uses the raw results of every web data benchmark we published. A benchmark counts if it tests web data providers and records the outcome of each request. A provider's index score is the average of its success rates across the benchmarks it ran in. Every benchmark carries equal weight, so a 1,400-request study counts as much as a 260,000-request one. Success means the response returned the target page with the content we asked for. We check that against bot pages and empty shells, so a 200 response with a challenge page counts as a failure. If a provider was never tested in a benchmark, we show a dash instead of a zero.
Targets come from the Tranco list, which ranks domains by averaging several traffic rankings. We remove dead, adult, gambling and malicious hosts before testing. Domains are grouped into categories: e-commerce, social media, search engines, video and streaming, travel, reviews, food delivery, app stores, real estate, job postings, news and publishing, developer and SaaS, finance, government and education, and other. Structured JSON coverage is checked on the top 100. Cost is per 1,000 successful pages, not per 1,000 requests sent. We take the cheapest plan a provider offers at that volume and divide by the success rate we measured. Completion time is how long one request takes from start to finish. Metadata fields are the parsed fields a provider returns when it answers with JSON. AI ready is the share of responses that came back as clean markdown. The anti-bot results come from two of our runs, the unblocker benchmark across 10,000 domains and the e-commerce benchmark across the top 100 domains, with each domain labelled by the vendor guarding it. Whiskers are 95% confidence intervals.
Explore Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
We Tested the Best SERP Scraper APIs
We benchmarked the leading SERP providers using 18,000 live requests across Google, Bing, and Yandex. See the top 6 providers outperforming in our speed and data richness tests: Compare providers’ median response time and the average number of fields that they returned in our benchmark: 1,200 queries were used in this benchmark, including a total…
Top 5 Free Chrome Extensions for Web Scraping
A Chrome web scraper extension enables you to collect data such as text, tables, links, images, and lists directly from your browser. Many extensions offer no-code workflows, AI-powered field detection, scheduled scraping, Google Sheets exports, and page-change monitoring. Compare the popular web scraper Chrome extensions by their key capabilities, export options, ease of use, and…
Large-Scale Web Scraping: 7 Providers Benchmarked
We ran two benchmarks against live websites, from 5 to 5,000 concurrent requests. The first sent 260,000 requests through four web unblockers across the Tranco top 10,000 domains, plus a markdown extraction test on 10,000 URLs. The second fetched 65,000 product and search pages from each of five scraping providers across 100 e-commerce domains. Metrics…
Top 6 Apple App Store Scrapers: Bright Data, SerpAPI & Zyte
We benchmarked 6 web scraping providers against 1,000 Apple App Store pages, for a total of 6,000 requests, and measured success rate, completion time, and the number of metadata fields each provider returned. Since all providers achieved 100% success rates, we focused our comparison on the number of metadata fields returned and end-to-end response times.…