Apify entered the index.
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
v1.3Provider success rates, response times and metadata coverage across our web scraping benchmarks. See the methodology.
Leaderboard
Filter by tool type and must-have requirements. Sort any column.
# | Model | Index | Social media | Search engines | Video & streaming | Reviews | Food delivery | App stores | Real estate | Job postings | Google Maps | Web unblocker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data | 91.7 | 86.8 | - | 98.9 | 78.0 | 94.3 | 99.8 | 88.5 | 92.1 | - | 94.8 |
| 2 | Apify | 91.3 | 99.9 | - | 99.6 | 98.6 | 55.7 | - | 94.0 | - | 100.0 | - |
| 3 | Zyte | 88.2 | 99.3 | 72.1 | 99.6 | 65.0 | 82.2 | 99.5 | 65.6 | 64.8 | 99.9 | 95.4 |
| 4 | Nimble | 82.8 | 82.0 | 50.7 | 97.7 | 52.4 | 84.9 | 99.7 | 86.0 | 71.1 | 98.9 | 95.6 |
| 5 | Oxylabs | 81.0 | 91.6 | 97.4 | 99.7 | 56.2 | 90.8 | 99.6 | 71.1 | 64.6 | 94.4 | - |
| 6 | Decodo | 74.1 | 81.9 | 84.7 | 99.5 | 35.9 | 90.0 | 99.7 | 74.8 | 64.5 | - | - |
Cost vs. performance
Web scraper cost across our 100 e-commerce domain benchmark, and web unblocker cost across 10,000 domains. Volume-adjusted per successful request.
Avg is the effective per-1k rate we paid in our benchmark, volume-adjusted with each provider's cheapest available plan. Min is the cheapest tier each provider offers. Max is the most expensive tier.
Provider profile
Price per successful page, completion time, metadata depth, domains returning structured JSON and AI readiness for each provider.
# | Model | Domains with JSON | Avg metadata fields | $ per 1k | Completion time (s) | AI ready |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data | 24 | 29 | 1.5 | 22.8 | 79 |
| 2 | Apify | 10 | 38 | 13.7 | 19.9 | 55 |
| 3 | Zyte | 0 | 1 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 60 |
| 4 | Nimble | 6 | 1 | 1.0 | 14.6 | 70 |
| 5 | Oxylabs | 12 | 1 | 2.0 | 18.0 | 71 |
| 6 | Decodo | 6 | 3 | 2.4 | 20.1 | 64 |
Behaviour under load
Success rate tracked at 1, 100, 500 and 5,000 parallel requests.
Anti-bot landscape
Which vendor guards your targets predicts your success rate.
Web unblocks across the top 10k domains
Scraping APIs across the top 10k domains
Domain coverage by provider
Which of the Tranco top 100 domains each provider can scrape, and for which of them it also returns structured JSON. Scraping support comes from our web unblocker benchmark; JSON support comes from a separate test of parsed output on the same domains. Domains are sorted by coverage, so the ones most providers support appear at the top.
| Domain | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| google.com | |||||||
| chatgpt.com | |||||||
| bing.com | |||||||
| amazon.com | |||||||
| facebook.com | |||||||
| tiktok.com | |||||||
| youtube.com | |||||||
| baidu.com | |||||||
| googlevideo.com | |||||||
| yandex.ru | |||||||
| apple.com | |||||||
| github.com | |||||||
| instagram.com | |||||||
| microsoft.com | |||||||
| office.com | |||||||
| twitter.com | |||||||
| wikipedia.org | |||||||
| yahoo.com | |||||||
| youtu.be | |||||||
| zoom.us | |||||||
| Domains scraped | 68 | 12 | 6 | 73 | 67 | 10 | 13 |
✓ The provider scrapes the domain. ✅ The provider scrapes the domain and returns structured JSON. ✕ The provider does not scrape the domain. Of the providers in this table, only Bright Data, Nimble and Zyte ran in the web unblocker benchmark; for the other providers the table shows JSON support only.
Web data providers markdown output performance
Markdown extraction success rate and completion time from our web unblocker benchmark, and the output formats each provider returns.
| Provider | Markdown | HTML |
|---|---|---|
Success rate by page type and concurrency
Product pages and search pages behave differently on the same domain.
Frequently asked questions
Methodology
The index re-uses the raw results of every web data benchmark we published. A benchmark counts if it tests web data providers and records the outcome of each request. A provider's index score is the average of its success rates across the benchmarks it ran in. Every benchmark carries equal weight, so a 1,400-request study counts as much as a 260,000-request one. Success means the response returned the target page with the content we asked for. We check that against bot pages and empty shells, so a 200 response with a challenge page counts as a failure. If a provider was never tested in a benchmark, we show a dash instead of a zero.
Targets come from the Tranco list, which ranks domains by averaging several traffic rankings. We remove dead, adult, gambling and malicious hosts before testing. Domains are grouped into categories: e-commerce, social media, search engines, video and streaming, travel, reviews, food delivery, app stores, real estate, job postings, news and publishing, developer and SaaS, finance, and government and education. Domain coverage and structured JSON support are checked on the top 100. Cost is per 1,000 successful pages, not per 1,000 requests sent. We take the cheapest plan a provider offers at that volume and divide by the success rate we measured. Completion time is how long one request takes from start to finish. Metadata fields are the parsed fields a provider returns when it answers with JSON. AI ready is the share of responses that came back as clean markdown. The anti-bot results come from two of our runs, the unblocker benchmark across 10,000 domains and the e-commerce benchmark across the top 100 domains, with each domain labelled by the vendor guarding it. Whiskers are 95% confidence intervals.
Changelog
15 updates- v1.3
Apify entered the index.
- v1.3
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: The index is now built from the raw results of every published web data benchmark, each weighted equally. Version updated to v1.3.
- v1.2
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Each benchmark is now scored on its own, and providers with too few samples are left out. Version updated to v1.2.
- v1.1
5 providers entered the index: Bright Data, Decodo, Nimble, Oxylabs, Zyte.
- v1.1
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Providers are now scored per benchmark category and per tool type (scraping API or web unblocker). Version updated to v1.1.
- v1.0
Ethical web data benchmark: Added a Methodology limitations section at the end of the benchmark.
Explore Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
- Web DatasetsOpen World EvaluationAug 13
Amazon Dataset Comparison
Amazon datasets can support pricing intelligence, seller analysis, market research, and lead generation. However, buyers should compare providers not by price and format, but also by data freshness, historical coverage, and delivery method. For example, Bright Data is best suited for buyers seeking ready-made or customizable Amazon datasets, offering multiple delivery options, while Exellius focuses…
- Web Data ScrapingOpen World EvaluationAug 4
Top 5 Free Chrome Extensions for Web Scraping
A Chrome web scraper extension enables you to collect data such as text, tables, links, images, and lists directly from your browser. Many extensions offer no-code workflows, AI-powered field detection, scheduled scraping, Google Sheets exports, and page-change monitoring. Compare the popular web scraper Chrome extensions by their key capabilities, export options, ease of use, and…
- E-commerce ScrapingOpen World EvaluationJul 24
Best Google Shopping APIs
Selecting the best Google Shopping API depends on whether a business needs to manage its own Merchant Center data or collect public Google Shopping results for market intelligence. Google’s official Merchant API is designed to manage Merchant Center and product data programmatically, while third-party APIs such as SerpApi are used to scrape public Google Shopping…
- Scraping ToolsOpen World EvaluationJul 1
Top 10 Open Source Web Crawlers for LLM & AI
Recent advances in generative AI have reshaped what developers need from web crawlers. Agentic crawlers now use natural-language prompts to select links rather than fixed rules, and produce token-efficient markdown natively. At the same time, the classic frameworks for large-scale batch crawling remain irreplaceable for enterprise and research use. Language: Python | License: Apache 2.0…