Apify entered the index.
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
v1.3Provider success rates, response times and metadata coverage across our web scraping benchmarks. See the methodology.
Leaderboard
Filter by tool type and must-have requirements. Sort any column.
# | Model | Index | Social media | Search engines | Video & streaming | Reviews | Food delivery | App stores | Real estate | Job postings | Google Maps | Web unblocker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data | 91.7 | 86.8 | - | 98.9 | 78.0 | 94.3 | 99.8 | 88.5 | 92.1 | - | 94.8 |
| 2 | Apify | 91.3 | 99.9 | - | 99.6 | 98.6 | 55.7 | - | 94.0 | - | 100.0 | - |
| 3 | Zyte | 88.2 | 99.3 | 72.1 | 99.6 | 65.0 | 82.2 | 99.5 | 65.6 | 64.8 | 99.9 | 95.4 |
| 4 | Nimble | 82.8 | 82.0 | 50.7 | 97.7 | 52.4 | 84.9 | 99.7 | 86.0 | 71.1 | 98.9 | 95.6 |
| 5 | Oxylabs | 81.0 | 91.6 | 97.4 | 99.7 | 56.2 | 90.8 | 99.6 | 71.1 | 64.6 | 94.4 | - |
| 6 | Decodo | 74.1 | 81.9 | 84.7 | 99.5 | 35.9 | 90.0 | 99.7 | 74.8 | 64.5 | - | - |
Cost vs. performance
Web scraper cost across our 100 e-commerce domain benchmark, and web unblocker cost across 10,000 domains. Volume-adjusted per successful request.
Avg is the effective per-1k rate we paid in our benchmark, volume-adjusted with each provider's cheapest available plan. Min is the cheapest tier each provider offers. Max is the most expensive tier.
Provider profile
Price per successful page, completion time, metadata depth, domains returning structured JSON and AI readiness for each provider.
# | Model | Domains with JSON | Avg metadata fields | $ per 1k | Completion time (s) | AI ready |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright Data | 24 | 29 | 1.5 | 22.8 | 79 |
| 2 | Apify | 10 | 38 | 13.7 | 19.9 | 55 |
| 3 | Zyte | 0 | 1 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 60 |
| 4 | Nimble | 6 | 1 | 1.0 | 14.6 | 70 |
| 5 | Oxylabs | 12 | 1 | 2.0 | 18.0 | 71 |
| 6 | Decodo | 6 | 3 | 2.4 | 20.1 | 64 |
Behaviour under load
Success rate tracked at 1, 100, 500 and 5,000 parallel requests.
Anti-bot landscape
Which vendor guards your targets predicts your success rate.
Web unblocks across the top 10k domains
Scraping APIs across the top 10k domains
Domain coverage by provider
Which of the Tranco top 100 domains each provider can scrape, and for which of them it also returns structured JSON. Scraping support comes from our web unblocker benchmark; JSON support comes from a separate test of parsed output on the same domains. Domains are sorted by coverage, so the ones most providers support appear at the top.
| Domain | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| google.com | |||||||
| chatgpt.com | |||||||
| bing.com | |||||||
| amazon.com | |||||||
| facebook.com | |||||||
| tiktok.com | |||||||
| youtube.com | |||||||
| baidu.com | |||||||
| googlevideo.com | |||||||
| yandex.ru | |||||||
| apple.com | |||||||
| github.com | |||||||
| instagram.com | |||||||
| microsoft.com | |||||||
| office.com | |||||||
| twitter.com | |||||||
| wikipedia.org | |||||||
| yahoo.com | |||||||
| youtu.be | |||||||
| zoom.us | |||||||
| Domains scraped | 68 | 12 | 6 | 73 | 67 | 10 | 13 |
✓ The provider scrapes the domain. ✅ The provider scrapes the domain and returns structured JSON. ✕ The provider does not scrape the domain. Of the providers in this table, only Bright Data, Nimble and Zyte ran in the web unblocker benchmark; for the other providers the table shows JSON support only.
Web data providers markdown output performance
Markdown extraction success rate and completion time from our web unblocker benchmark, and the output formats each provider returns.
| Provider | Markdown | HTML |
|---|---|---|
Success rate by page type and concurrency
Product pages and search pages behave differently on the same domain.
Frequently asked questions
Methodology
The index re-uses the raw results of every web data benchmark we published. A benchmark counts if it tests web data providers and records the outcome of each request. A provider's index score is the average of its success rates across the benchmarks it ran in. Every benchmark carries equal weight, so a 1,400-request study counts as much as a 260,000-request one. Success means the response returned the target page with the content we asked for. We check that against bot pages and empty shells, so a 200 response with a challenge page counts as a failure. If a provider was never tested in a benchmark, we show a dash instead of a zero.
Targets come from the Tranco list, which ranks domains by averaging several traffic rankings. We remove dead, adult, gambling and malicious hosts before testing. Domains are grouped into categories: e-commerce, social media, search engines, video and streaming, travel, reviews, food delivery, app stores, real estate, job postings, news and publishing, developer and SaaS, finance, and government and education. Domain coverage and structured JSON support are checked on the top 100. Cost is per 1,000 successful pages, not per 1,000 requests sent. We take the cheapest plan a provider offers at that volume and divide by the success rate we measured. Completion time is how long one request takes from start to finish. Metadata fields are the parsed fields a provider returns when it answers with JSON. AI ready is the share of responses that came back as clean markdown. The anti-bot results come from two of our runs, the unblocker benchmark across 10,000 domains and the e-commerce benchmark across the top 100 domains, with each domain labelled by the vendor guarding it. Whiskers are 95% confidence intervals.
Changelog
15 updates- v1.3
Apify entered the index.
- v1.3
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: The index is now built from the raw results of every published web data benchmark, each weighted equally. Version updated to v1.3.
- v1.2
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Each benchmark is now scored on its own, and providers with too few samples are left out. Version updated to v1.2.
- v1.1
5 providers entered the index: Bright Data, Decodo, Nimble, Oxylabs, Zyte.
- v1.1
Web Data Scraping Benchmarks: Providers are now scored per benchmark category and per tool type (scraping API or web unblocker). Version updated to v1.1.
- v1.0
Ethical web data benchmark: Added a Methodology limitations section at the end of the benchmark.
Explore Web Data Scraping Benchmarks
- Scraping ToolsFeature ComparisonAug 14
Best Python Web Scraping Libraries
Based on my over a decade of software development experience, including my role as CTO at AIMultiple, where I led data collection from ~80,000 web domains, I have selected the top Python web scraping libraries. BeautifulSoup is a Python library for parsing HTML and XML and extracting data from web pages. It sits on top…
- Scraping ToolsFeature ComparisonAug 14
Playwright vs Selenium: When to Use Each
Playwright is a browser automation framework released by Microsoft in 2020. Selenium is an open-source project, active since 2004, that supports a wide range of browsers and languages. Playwright offers fine-grained control for scraping dynamic sources, including single-page applications that load content through AJAX, and supports request interception. Selenium is also used for data collection,…
- Web Data ScrapingInsightAug 13
The Most Common Web Scraping Challenges
Web scraping has become more difficult in recent years. Since 2025, AI-related scraping has raised significant legal concerns. Platforms and infrastructure providers have adopted new methods to control AI crawlers and manage data collection. There are many technical challenges that web scrapers face due to the barriers set by data owners or website owners to…
- Scraping Use CasesAug 13
Web Scraping for Recruiters: Top Tools & Techniques
Recruiters rely on web data to build talent pools, monitor hiring demand, and benchmark compensation. But how you collect that data matters. Many automation tools use cookie/session-based scraping (higher risk of bans), while proxy-based scraping APIs and managed scrapers are built for scale and reliability. Dedicated scrapers and site-specific APIs are the right option when…
- Web DatasetsOpen World EvaluationAug 13
Best YouTube Datasets: Bright Data & Oxylabs
YouTube has become a primary source for training advanced multimodal AI and large language models (LLMs). However, obtaining YouTube data at scale remains difficult due to anti-bot measures and bandwidth requirements. This review examines key companies in the YouTube data sector: Bright Data, Oxylabs, Decodo, and Grepsr. Each targets a specific market segment, ranging from…
- Scraping ToolsOpen World EvaluationAug 13
We Compared the Best Web Scraping Tools
We cover 13+ of the top web scraping tools, split into two categories: We tested leading web scraping APIs across thousands of URLs. Use the table below to compare their site coverage, request success rate, metadata richness, and average latency: These are managed “send a URL, get data back” services. You don’t manage proxies, rotate…
- Web DatasetsOpen World EvaluationAug 13
The Best E-Commerce Dataset Providers
Paid dataset providers offer up-to-date, large-scale e-commerce data with defined coverage and regular updates, supporting applications like competitor price and stock-level tracking. In contrast, free e-commerce datasets are usually static and outdated, limiting their value for real-time decision-making, including dynamic repricing. Bright Data is one of the largest providers by publicly stated dataset volume. It…
- Anti-BlockingBenchmarkAug 13
Best CAPTCHA Solving Services
We compared 10 CAPTCHA-solving services based on which CAPTCHA types each one supports, whether it solves CAPTCHAs via AI or human workers, and how it prices. We also stress-tested the four integrated unblockers (Bright Data, Decodo, Oxylabs, Zyte) against the real-world target, Cloudflare’s Under Attack mode. To see how the integrated unblockers hold up against…