LLM Benchmarks
One transparent Intelligence Index combining public benchmarks with AIMultiple's own agentic, RAG and enterprise-reasoning evaluations.
Leaderboard
The highest-scoring models across all benchmarks.
# | Model | Index | LegalBench | FinanceReasoning | Text-to-SQL | Agentic RAG | ARC-AGI-2 | Agentic LLM Benchmark | FrontierMath | Swe-Bench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Claude Fable 5 Anthropic | 92 | 89 | 90 | 90 | 98 | - | 69 | - | - |
| 2 |  Kimi K3 Moonshot AI | 88 | 86 | 88 | 77 | 93 | - | 73 | - | - |
| 3 |  GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI | 87 | 87 | 90 | 74 | 87 | 93 | 62 | - | - |
| 4 |  Grok 4.5 X | 86 | 86 | 88 | 79 | 83 | - | 73 | - | - |
| 5 | GPT-5.5 OpenAI | 83 | 87 | - | - | - | 85 | 59 | - | - |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI | 80 | 85 | 87 | 71 | 91 | 84 | 61 | - | - |
| 7 | GPT-5.6 Sol Pro OpenAI | 80 | - | 91 | 79 | 96 | - | 54 | - | - |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | 78 | - | 88 | 68 | 80 | 69 | 72 | - | - |
| 9 |  Gemini 3 Pro Preview Google | 77 | 87 | 86 | 60 | 89 | 31 | - | - | - |
| 10 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google | 77 | 87 | 87 | 65 | 89 | 77 | 46 | 27 | - |
Page 1 of 7 | ||||||||||
Charts
Following "Best Performing" models
How The Index is Built
The Intelligence Index normalizes each benchmark to a 0-100 scale and averages a model's relative standing across the benchmarks it was evaluated on. Each benchmark below feeds that score.
Recent Updates
Latest changes to the Intelligence Index, model coverage and AIMultiple benchmark methodology.
Kimi K3
New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.
GPT-5.6 Sol
New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.
GPT-5.6 Terra
New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro
New model added to the AIMultiple Intelligence Index.
Explore LLM Use Cases, Analyses & Benchmarks
Compare Multimodal AI Models on Visual Reasoning
We benchmarked 15 leading multimodal AI models on visual reasoning using 200 visual-based questions. The evaluation consisted of two tracks: 100 chart understanding questions testing data visualization interpretation, and 100 visual logic questions assessing pattern recognition and spatial reasoning. Each question was run 5 times to ensure consistent and reliable results. See our benchmark methodology…
LLM Market Share: Compare Usage & Adoption
We analyzed LLM market share by combining usage-based data and web visit estimates to show how demand for large language models is distributed across AI labs and AI applications: Read the methodology to see how we measured and calculated these results. The United States dominated web visits across all four months, consistently accounting for 85.5–90.5%.…
Top LLMOps Tools & Compare them to MLOPs
LLMOps platforms handle the operational side of running large language models: deployment, monitoring, evaluation, and cost management. We examined top LLMOps tools, their core features, pricing models, and how they differ from each other to help identify the best fit for various use cases. A breakdown of each metric is provided below: LLMOps platforms support…
Compare 9 Large Language Models in Healthcare
We benchmarked 9 LLMs using the MedQA dataset, a graduate-level clinical exam benchmark derived from USMLE questions. Each model answered the same multiple-choice clinical scenarios using a standardized prompt, enabling direct comparison of accuracy. We also recorded latency per question by dividing total runtime by the number of MedQA items completed. Benchmark methodology: This benchmark…
LLM Parameters: GPT-5 High, Medium, Low and Minimal
Some LLMs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5 family, come in different versions (e.g., GPT-5, GPT-5-mini, and GPT-5-nano) and with various parameter settings, including high, medium, low, and minimal. Below, we explore the differences between these model versions by gathering their benchmark performance and the costs to run the benchmarks. We used the GPT-5 family in our…
LLM Orchestration in 2026: 22 Frameworks and Gateways
Optimizing LLM orchestration is key to improving performance while keeping resource use under control. To evaluate how different orchestration approaches perform in practice, we benchmarked: Discover selected LLM orchestration tools, including developer frameworks and enterprise gateways: LLM Orchestration involves managing and integrating multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform complex tasks efficiently. It ensures smooth…
The Future of Large Language Models
See the future of large language models by delving into promising approaches, such as self-training, fact-checking, and sparse expertise that could address LLM limitations. Success rate comparison of LLM’s Claude Sonnet 4.6 led the benchmark with an overall score of 0.748, with base and thinking variants tied to three decimal places. Claude Opus 4.8 (0.702),…
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) vs LLMs
We evaluated the performance of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in financial reasoning tasks using a carefully selected dataset. By analyzing a subset of high-quality financial samples, we assess the models’ capabilities in processing and reasoning with multimodal data in the financial domain. The methodology section provides detailed insights into the dataset and evaluation framework employed.…
10+ Large Language Model Examples
We have gathered open-source benchmarks to compare leading proprietary and open-source large language models. Choose your use case to find the right model. You can evaluate large language models by examining their benchmark performance and real-world latency (available by clicking each model’s name in the table), and by reviewing their pricing to assess overall efficiency…
Cloud LLM vs Local LLMs: Examples & Benefits
Cloud LLMs, powered by advanced models like GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7, offer scalability and accessibility. Conversely, Local LLMs, driven by open-source models such as Llama 4, DeepSeek V4, and Qwen3.6-Plus, ensure stronger privacy and customization. Explore what are cloud LLMs, strengths and weaknesses, most common case studies with real-life examples, and how they differ…